Laserfiche WebLink
r� <br /> Regional lithologic lateral and vertical variation are present in the shallow aquifer strata <br /> and underlying confining strata, which are typical for river and floodplain deposits in this <br /> portion of the San Joaquin Valley (see Geologic Cross Section, Figure 2) While regional <br /> lateral and vertical variation are present in the aquifer and confining strata, these strata as <br /> a whole form the aquifer stratigraphy between about 10- to 24-feet The underlying <br /> confining strata display some lateral lithologic variations and were not observed to yield <br /> water However, given the lateral lithologic variation, and as mentioned above, it is <br /> possible that these strata leak (up or down) vertical gradients In our opinion, on the basis <br /> of these observations, both aquifer strata and the underlying confining strata are <br /> interpreted to have some lateral extent underlying the immediate site vicinity <br /> Chemical Analysis <br /> A total of thirty-nine (39) soil samples and eleven reconnaissance groundwater samples <br /> were analyzed at Chromalab, Inc a State certified analytical laboratory from the <br /> exploratory borings These samples were tested for the following, Total Petroleum <br /> Hydrocarbons as Gasoline (TPHG) and Diesel (TPHD), Benzene (B), Toluene (T), <br /> Ethylbenzene (E) and Xylene (X), Methyl-tert-butyl-ether (MTBE) and fuel oxygenates, <br /> using EPA Methods 3510/8015, 8020, 8240 and 8260 The results are tabulated and <br /> • presented in the attached Tables I and 2 below <br /> Discussion <br /> Soil Chemical Data <br /> The site assessment revealed that low concentrations of highly degraded contaminants <br /> were present in the capillary fringe at PB-17 (advanced through the edge of the former <br /> UST pit), at P13-15, 16 and 19 (immediately downgradient of the former UST pit) at PB- <br /> 10 and PB-18 near MW-9, and at PB-13 near MW-3 Other capillary fringe samples <br /> showed that contaminants were not detected Intermediate depth soil samples also <br /> showed that contaminants were not detected with the exception of PB-14-4 at 22 feet <br /> where 0 014 parts per billion (ppb) of Xylene were detected Contaminants were not <br /> detected in the deepest soil samples at PB-12-5 at 26 feet and PB-13-5 at 26 feet MTBE <br /> and oxygenates were not detected in any soil sample Soil samples collected at the 25-26 <br /> foot depths in PB-13, 18 and 19 showed that contaminants were not detected (see Tables <br /> 1 and 2) <br /> Reconnaissance Groundwater Chemical Data <br /> Four reconnaissance groundwater samples were collected on April 25, 2001, and all <br /> contained various concentrations of TPHG and BTEX contaminants (see Table 2) The <br /> highest concentrations observed from the April 25, 2000 bonngs were at PB-1 l (31,000 <br /> ppb TPHG and 170 ppb Benzene) and at PB-13 (21,000 ppb TPHG and 160 ppb <br /> . Benzene) MTBE and oxygenates were not detected in any groundwater sample (see <br /> Table 3) <br /> Page 6 <br />