Laserfiche WebLink
n -' "�'"''r-fes-.;, S. u-^''41ti.^rF y ..�I*' tr",,. ^'k.Ti' '��, y' N. a,�,^cy� -C �a,.. a" 'S, E�i;�s titrw� aT ��' +ate-..✓M <br /> y <br /> T <br /> iTable 1. Monitoring Well Water Levels, cont. <br /> Well Date Well Depth to Casing Water Floating <br /> No Sampled Depth Water Elev Elev Product <br /> (ft) (ft) (MSL ft)' (MSL ft) <br /> MW-8^ 8/20/97 16 00 796 4790 39 94 None <br /> MW-8^ 12/12/97 16 00 757 ----- 40 33 None <br /> MW-8^ 3/31/98 14 56 679 ----- 41 11 None <br /> MW-8^ 6/30/98 14 51 679 ----- 40 95 None <br /> MW-8^ 9129198 14 51 824 ----- 39 66 None <br /> MW-8^ 1/14/99 14 51 798 ----- 39 92 None <br /> MW-9^ 8/20/97 15 95 833 48 28 39 95 None <br /> MW-9^ 12/12/97 15 95 800 ----- 40 28 None <br /> MW-9^ 3131198 13 18 723 ----- 41 05 None <br /> MW-9^ 6/30/98 13 18 749 ----- 41 79 None <br /> MW-9^ 9/29/98 13 18 876 ----- 39 52 None <br /> MW-9^ 1/14199 13 18 841 ----- 39 87 None <br /> " Casing elevation data from Evax Technologies, Site Investigation Report, April 7, 1992 <br /> ^ Casing elevation data from Triple "E" Engineering and Surveying, August 14, 1997 <br /> The sampler proceeded to purge well volumes of groundwater using a submersible electric <br /> purging pump (a volume calculation was done for each well following sounding measurements) <br /> Between each well volume purge, conductivity, pH, and water temperature readings were <br /> obtained and noted on the attached groundwater sampling information sheets Once these <br /> readings stabilized after two consecutive purge volumes aquifer water is assumed to be entering <br /> the well When the well recovered to about 80% of the initial water level, the sample was <br /> collected Purge water was stored on-site in drums The well sampling information sheets <br /> containing data on temperature, conductivity, pH, depth to water, and well volumes purged are <br /> attached <br /> The groundwater sample was collected with a new disposable bailer The groundwater sample <br /> was then poured with minimum cavitation into the appropriate, laboratory prepared sample <br /> containers leaving no headspace The sample container was then immediately capped, labeled and <br /> placed in a chilled ice chest for shipment to Chromalab, Inc in Pleasanton, California (a State <br /> Certified Testing Lab) under chain-of-custody documentation <br /> Groundwater Contour Map and Flow Gradient <br /> A groundwater contour map to a known datum was prepared for the data listed in Table 1 above <br /> (see Figure 1) The groundwater flow direction was to the north-northwesterly under a <br /> calculated gradient of 0 003 The flow direction is consistent with historic observed trends, <br /> and remains relatively flat Overall groundwater levels appear to have declined slightly from <br /> the previous quarter <br /> 40 <br /> Page 3 <br />