Laserfiche WebLink
c <br /> • Table 1 Monitoring Well Water Levels, con't <br /> Well Date Well Depth to Casing Water Floating <br /> No Sampled Depth% Water Elev Elev Product <br /> (ft) (ft) (MSL ft)" (MSL ft) <br /> MW-74 8120197 1495 782 4878 4096 None <br /> MW-7^ 12/12/97 1495 784 — 4094 None <br /> MW-7^ 3/31198 1304 708 ---- 4167 None <br /> MW-7^ 6/30198 1305 709 — 4169 None <br /> MW-7^ 9129/98 1305 839 ----- 4039 None <br /> MW-8^ 8120/97 1600 796 4790 3994 None <br /> MW-8^ 12/12/97 1600 757 ---- 4033 None <br /> MW-8^ 3/31/98 1456 6 79 --- 41 11 None <br /> MW-8^ 6/30198 1451 679 — 4095 None <br /> MW-8^ 9/29/98 1458 824 ----- 3956 None <br /> MW-9^ 8/20197 1595 833 4828 3995 None <br /> MW-9^ 12/12/97 1595 800 — 4028 None <br /> MW-9^ 3/31/98 13 18 723 ----- 41 05 None <br /> MW-9" 6130198 13 18 749 — 41 79 None <br /> MW-9^ 9129/98 13 18 876 — 3952 None <br /> *Casing elevation data from EVAX Technologies, Site Investigation Report, April 7, 1992 <br /> " Casing elevation data from Triple"E" Engineering and Surveying, August 14, 1997 <br />• %Well depth measured to observe for long term well silting <br /> The sampler removed purge well volumes of groundwater using a submersible electric purging pump (a <br /> volume calculation was done for each well following sounding measurements) Between each well <br /> volume purge, conductivity, pH, and water temperature readings were obtained and noted on the <br /> attached groundwater sampling information sheets Once these readings stabilized after two <br /> consecutive purge volumes aquifer water is assumed to be entering the well When the well recovered <br /> to about 80% of the initial water level, the sample was collected Purge water was stored on-site in <br /> drums The field well sampling information sheets containing temperature, conductivity, pH, depth to <br /> water, and well volume data purged are attached <br /> The groundwater sample was collected with a new disposable bailer The groundwater sample was then <br /> poured with minimum cavitation into the appropriate, laboratory prepared sample containers leaving no <br /> headspace The sample container was then immediately capped, labeled and placed in a chilled ice <br /> chest for shipment to Chromalab, Inc in Pleasanton, California (a State Certified Testing Lab) under <br /> chain-of-custody <br /> Groundwater Contour Map and Flow Gradient <br /> A groundwater contour map to a known datum was prepared for the data lasted in Table 1 above (see <br /> Figure 1) The groundwater flow direction was to the northerly under a calculated gradient of 0 0031 and <br /> is consistent with historic observed trends Overall groundwater levels appear to have declined about <br /> 1 7 feet from the previous quarter The large groundwater mound at MW-9 in the previously quarter has <br /> disappeared MW-9 is very near an agricultural line and periodic leakage from either that pipeline or <br /> another subsurface water source may occur nearby <br /> Page 3 <br />