Laserfiche WebLink
Ms Vicky Mc Cartney <br /> Page 4of6 <br /> • Analytical results of soil samples collected during the investigation are summarized in Table 1 <br /> Laboratory reports and chain of custody documentation are included in Attachment 3 f <br /> At the request of EHD, Ground Zero re-calculated the residual hydrocarbon mass remaining in soil <br /> beneath the site The remaining volume of contaminated soil is estimated at a maximum of <br /> approximately 145 cubic yards, all within the saturated zone, containing an estimated 155 pounds <br /> of gasoline It is estimated that approximately 193 cubic yards of contaminated soil was removed <br /> from the UST excavations in 2001 A copy of the residual contaminant mass calculation sheet, as <br /> well as figures showing the estimated extent of residual contamination, is included in Attachment <br /> 4 <br /> 4.3 Groundwater Analytical Results <br /> The grab groundwater samples collected from boring SB 1/SB l a contained elevated levels of <br /> gasoline constituents The sample collected from the top of the water table (12-15 feet bgs) <br /> contained TPHg at a concentration of 14,000 parts per billion (ppb), toluene at 45 ppb, <br /> ethylbenzene at 110 ppb, and xylenes at 160 ppb The groundwater sample collected at the base of <br /> the sand zone (21-24 feet bgs) contained TPHg at a concentration of 4,100 ppb, toluene at 23 ppb, <br /> ethylbenzene at 3 5 ppb, and xylenes at 19 ppb No benzene or gasoline additives were detected in <br /> either groundwater sample collected from boring SB 1/SB 1 a No petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> constituents were detected in the groundwater sample collected from boring SB2, which was <br /> collected from the top of the water table <br /> iThe grab groundwater samples collected from borings SB 1/SB 1 a and SB2 are considered "worst- <br /> case", because the water samples were unfiltered and contained a significant amount of sediment <br /> Groundwater samples collected from properly installed and developed monitoring wells are <br /> believed to be more representative of groundwater conditions A groundwater sample collected in <br /> 1 <br /> arch 2004 from well MW3, which was also drilled through the tank pit, contained only TPHg at <br /> 0 ppb and ethylbenzene at 1 2 ppb These levels are considerably lower than concentrations <br /> detected in the grab groundwater samples collected from boring SB 1/SB 1 a <br /> Analytical results of groundwater samples collected during the investigation are summarized in <br /> Table 1 Laboratory reports and chain of custody documentation are included in Attachment 3 <br /> Analytical results of groundwater samples collected from site wells are summarized in Table 2 <br /> Based upon the most recent analytical results from groundwater samples collected from site <br /> monitoring wells, we have estimated that less than 0 1 pound of gasoline constituents remain in <br /> the groundwater A copy of the residual contaminant mass calculation sheet, as well as figures <br /> showing the estimated extent of residual contamination, is included in Attachment 4 <br /> 4.4 Groundwater Modeling <br /> To address a concern outlined in your October 10, 2003 letter, we modeled the transport of <br /> dissolved contaminants from the source area to approximately 65 feet downgradient of the former <br /> USTs This distance corresponds to the approximate location boring SB2, which was drilled in the <br /> ! median of Eleventh Street The nearest known domestic/municipal well is more that 1,000 feet <br /> upgradient from the site <br /> GIGROUNDZE1Souza\Reports\ADD_SUSSURF_SUM doe <br />