Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> � yo rt�� s'`• <br /> TABLE 43 <br /> Section II Closures <br /> Inaddition, the following information and appropriate data for Appendix A <br /> shall be submitteduswhen evaluating Case 2 Closures. Ail conditions listed in <br /> Case #2 (page 9) m <br /> SITE- HISTORY <br /> Describe the size, age, condition, use and t�yR?�3f tank removed, and <br /> submit a map showing the former tansystem and existing buildings on <br /> site. <br /> the <br /> inventory <br /> rerecords reviewed <br /> for <br /> e three <br /> Submit an aa - Of <br /> months prior inordertosimatethequay <br /> released. <br /> � Submit a summary of past site information, such as precision test <br /> 7-(, results, tank repairs or construction activities. <br /> What types of businesses Operated ax this siteth p reachutank? <br /> What was the product volume pumped p <br /> 6. Submit a survey olk <br /> f nearby wells. Eltilit <br /> 7, List other sources of site specific information checked (e.g. State <br /> Company', Public Works Department, US and State Geologic ng,Surlocal fire <br /> and County Health Department, County and Regional Planning, <br /> departments, etc.). <br /> SIi'E CHARACTERISTICS <br /> I, pescribe.evidence of leakage present (e.g. stained soil, free product, <br /> odors, etc.). <br /> 2. Describe visible preferential pathways {sand lens, root holes, etc.) in <br /> the excavation pits. , streametc.) or <br /> 3. Submit site map of surface waterbodies (ponds, creeks ,ace conduits (sewers, septic tanks, utility lines, etc.) <br /> possible subsurf <br /> in the vicinity of the site. <br /> i <br /> SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> (if the an <br /> to any of the following is NO, <br /> full explanations are required) <br /> I. Were additional samples (other than the minimum required) taken where <br /> obviously contaminated soil was present. <br /> 2. Did sampling and analytical protocols conform to standards described in <br /> LUFT and this document? <br /> 3, Were the appropriate laboratory analyses used (see Table 2)? <br /> 4. Were the laboratory analysis and were�samslesstaken�from�the sidewalls <br /> - - <br /> 5. In cases of high water table, a) p <br /> --------and-b)-was-water-present-an—the_=excayation pit?. <br /> 6. Were soil samples taken for-every 24 .lineal feet of underground-piping? <br /> 7. Were depth.and location of soil samples submitted? <br /> -21- <br />