Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> both- for every 20 linear feet of <br /> YES to b soil samples taken <br /> Were the <br /> 6• iging? the removal Of <br /> P t from in for WEGE <br /> undergroundthe trenches le sneer g <br /> Walton Eng visits by that no <br /> Field screening °f erformed by uent site line <br /> was pfd on subseq held pID indicated <br /> xO' i ing hand a product <br /> underground staining• th a ted along th <br /> and visual d staining., ation exis <br /> wi <br /> fief scr tamin <br /> geologist' <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon cD Submitted' <br /> and location of soil samples <br /> trenches' <br /> were depth <br /> 7• t WEGE <br /> 3B and Table 2' d the monitoring that we <br /> yES, see Figure eyed for Closure• ling <br /> informafi°n ar`onsid the initial sampling <br /> Pon the prec. site should befound in <br /> $aced a this drocarbons tank excavation been <br /> performed an e by with the and have <br /> has the gasoline associ.atedmited in extent Methods. <br /> feel roundwervery and dilution <br /> m n�tor well Matural evaporS:cion <br /> via natural. wells <br /> onsite monitor levation, <br /> SITE II3VESTIGATIO" the three Surface. for each <br /> water was sdmp;ed in WEGE) geologist• recorded of <br /> were any . <br /> The grO�stern Geo-Engineers water elevation observed in <br /> by a W and ground Prod, was approximately 2 <br /> to water NO -loafing P 5 bailers ( PP was „contained° <br /> depth WEGE: TRBLwe13. was sampled of it urged't water This water was <br /> well ( Bach the P t• <br /> the wells. removed; Water Treatment and a <br /> gallons) .of waters were `i5 f at the drum On <br /> Y contour <br /> in a <br /> labeler d disposed °f the ground water was <br /> later removed information, urs <br /> flow direction 4A-4I) • <br /> the well In <br /> (Fig <br /> From tion <br /> the information <br /> ed using and indicate <br /> DISCU S10N maps were develop rounds thru 41• <br /> water contour uarterly mon�.toringsee FIGURES 4P' <br /> Ground during the g to the nOrtbeasty BTEX <br /> obtained direcrjons that TPU and rting <br /> apparent flow results show been below water <br /> laboratory have alway showed ground range <br /> The analYtical MW2 and MW3 initially m gasoline 1g88 <br /> tions in well MW1 with 11, <br /> conaentr°`BRL) • Monitor 1988, Sampling °n August then below <br /> its ( 0�1 June 1 r were <br /> rim b benzene• hydrocarbons the St'�,e of <br /> contaminated and 41 PP, which is below <br /> hydrocarbons .the gasoline babenzene, <br /> showed ts with 0•6 PP <br /> detection <br /> page4 <br />