Laserfiche WebLink
y Sp rt to 5�. <br /> TABLE #3 <br /> Section II Closures Q <br /> In addition, the following information and appropriate data for Appendix A <br /> shall be submitted when evaluating Case 2 Closures. ATI conditions listed in <br /> Case #2 (page 9) must be met. <br /> SITE HISTORY <br /> Describe the size,, condition, use and tya _tank removed, and <br /> s,ibmit a map showing the former tan_�%stem and existing buildings on <br /> site. <br /> Submit an Evaluation of the inventory records reviewed for the three <br /> months nrior to removal in order to estimate the quantity of product <br /> released. <br /> Ito .—f Submit a summary of past site information, such as precision test <br /> results, tank repairs or construction activities. <br /> What types of businesses operated a•4 this site previously? <br /> What was the product volume pumped per month for each tank? <br /> 6. Submit a survey of nearby wells. <br /> 7. List other-nurces of site specific information checked (e.g. Utility <br /> Company, Public Works Department, US and State Geologic Surveys, State <br /> and County Health Department, County and Regional Planning, local fire <br /> departments, et; ;). <br /> SITE CHARACTERISTICS <br /> Describe evidence of leakage present (e.g. stained soil, free product, <br /> odors, etc.). <br /> 2. Describe visible preferential pathways (sand lens, root holes, etc.) in <br /> the excavation pits. <br /> 3. Submit site imap'of surface waterbodies (ponds,'creeks, stream, etc.) or <br /> possible subsurface conduits (sewers, septic tanks, utility lines, etc.) <br /> in the vicinity of the site. <br /> SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> nn (If the answer to any of the following is NO, full explanations are required) <br /> I. Were additional samples (other than the minimum required) taken where <br /> obviously contaminated. soil was present? <br /> 2. Did sampling and analytical protocols conform to standards descv;•ibed in <br /> LUFT and this dccun-ront? <br /> 3.---Wer_e__the_appropr.-.iate-laboratory-analyses-used_(see-Table-2)? -- - — ------------- <br /> 4... Were the laboratory analysis and QA/QC results submitted? <br /> In cases of high water table, a) were samples taken froai the sidewalls <br /> and b) was water present in the excavation pit? <br /> 6• Were soil samples taken for every 20 lineal-feet of underground piping? <br /> 7• Were depth and location of soil samples submitted? <br /> -21- <br />