Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Fs= WESTERN GED-ENGINEERS <br /> SECTION 5.4 f <br /> FIELD INVESTIGATIVE METHODS <br /> y <br /> Western Geo-Engineersinvestigation consisted of: <br /> 1. Collecting soil and water samples from the excavations left <br /> during tank removal; <br /> 2. Drillingthree exploratory boreholes (monitor wells 9 through 3); <br /> 3. Convrting these boreholes into ground water monitoring wells; <br /> 4. Collecting gâ–șounr! ester samples; <br /> 5. Surveying the wPil heads; <br /> 6. Collecting grounu water gradient delta throughout this <br /> assessment period. <br /> SECTION 5.1 <br /> EXPLORATORY DRILLING <br /> The subsurface investigation consisted of drilling three exploratory borings at , <br /> pre-selected locations to help determine the extent of the soil and ground water <br /> contamination and whether the contamination had migrated off site. Each boring <br /> was drilled using a truck mounted drilling rig (Hogate Drilling) using a ten inch <br /> hollow-stem auger. The drilling rig and auger was steam cleaned prior to its use. <br /> All lubricated parts that were to enter or were near the boring were lubricated with <br /> olive oil. The sampling equipment was washed between each sampling Interval with <br /> surgical p. r <br /> I <br /> i al eves fresh <br /> water rinsed and steam cleaned. Relatively undisturbed soil <br /> water, within five feet and at the base <br /> t <br /> he to of the , <br /> samples were collected belowp <br /> of the borings using a modified California split-spoon sampler equipped with 2" <br /> diameter by 6" long clean brass sleeves. Borings were advanced to the desired <br /> depth with the hollow-stem auger, then the drill rod- bottom plug-cutter assembly <br /> was withdrawn, and the sampler, attached to the drill rod was lowered through the <br /> augers to the bottom of the borehole and then driven 18" into the soil with a 140 <br /> pound hammer. Soil samples were field checked for the presence of product odor, <br /> vapor, and visible product after each sample interval. A hand held Photovac "Tip" <br /> photoionizing detector, which was calibrated with 1 ppm benzene prior to drilling <br /> each day, was used. At each interval, the liner containing the soil sample having <br /> the highest reading from the "Tip" was immediately preserved and labeled by <br /> capping the ends of the liner with plastic caps, wrapping the entire liner (sleeve) <br /> with aluminum foil wrapping the foil with duct tape and placeing the appropriate <br /> label over thS tape prior to placing the samples into an ice chest, which cool <br /> samples to 4 C. These samples were then hand delivered to a State and San <br /> Joaquin County approved certified laboratory (Eureka Laboratorles, Sacramento, <br /> CA.) with chain of custody documentation. The remaining cored soil samples were <br /> labeled and used for HCl reamions and sieve, dilatancy, and plasticity using ASTM <br /> D2488-84 field analysis procedures. IPillell logs were prepared by a Western <br /> Caen-Engineers field geologist, <br /> and then categorizon site edthe usinglthe Unified nl'oils <br /> The samples were d <br /> Classification System and describing lithoivgy. The exploratory boring logs are <br /> presented in Appendix A. <br /> page 15 <br />