Laserfiche WebLink
WESTERN GEO-ENGINEERS <br /> SECTION 8.0 <br /> DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY <br /> 1 <br /> Desert Petroleum has owned and operated the project site as a gas station facility <br /> since 1979, this site has been an active service station prior to Desert Petroleum <br /> ownership. On April 19, 1988 the station was undergoing remodeling for Desert <br /> Petroleum, Inc. The existing tanks, piping, islands, and overall station was to be <br /> upgraded and remodeled by Walton Engineering of West Sacramento, CA. Upon <br /> tank removal hydrocarbon odors were noticed and the construction operation was <br /> discontinued, except for removal of known contaminated soil from the tank <br /> excavation area; until assessment of the possible contamination to soil and water <br /> could be performed (see figure 4A and Appendix J). Tank removal was performed <br /> on this date in which four underground storage tanks were removed done regular <br /> gasoline, one unleaded gasoline, one super unleaded asoline and one waste oil . <br /> a $ <br /> 9 9 I� 9 ) <br /> Shortly after tank removal, Western Geo-Engineers along with Walton Engineering <br /> proceeded with the initial phase of the investigation by installing three 2 inch ground r <br /> water monitoring wells (MW 1 through MW 3) on May 5 and 6, 1988 on site (see <br /> figures 4A and Appendices A. H, K and L). These welts were installed to a total <br /> depth of 29 feet. Monitor well 1 was installed north and closest to the tank <br /> excavation and sampling showed ground water contamination with hydrocarbons. <br /> Monitor well 2 was installed southeast of the excavation behind the station builiding <br /> yum <br /> and Monitor well 3 was installed east of the excavation and pre-existing p p <br /> islands. Sampling of monitor wells 2 and 3 indicate no ground water contamination . <br /> exists in this area Soil samples taken from the base and sidewalls of the fuel tank <br /> excavation m 1 indicate that all soil contamination associated <br /> at on and from bor <br /> g i (MW ) <br /> with the fuel tanks was removed during initial tank removal. The waste oil tank <br /> excavation had to be re- excavated, a soil sample taken at the base of the original <br /> excavation indicated that soil contaminated with oil type hydrocarbons still existed. <br /> e- v it site was performed June 6 1888 under the <br /> The re-excavation anon of the waste ® p , <br /> supervision of Western Geo-Engineers and San Joaquin Local Health inspectors. <br /> The excavation at this time was expanded in anorth-south and east- west direction <br /> } r 't les taken at the base <br /> and deepened oximatel 1112 to 2 fee . The fou soil samples <br /> of each ) of the excavation indicate that all contaminated soil has been removed. <br /> Total hydrocarbon concentrations that were present in the soil at the fuel tank . <br /> excavation ranged from non-detected in the native soil left after excavation to 33 <br /> parts per millon, gasoline range, in the spoil soil pile. Total hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations that were present in the waste oil excavation ranged from <br /> non-detected in the re-excavation to 32 parts per million. motor oil range, in the <br /> original excavation. Hydorcarbon concentrations in the ground water exposed in the <br /> fuel tank excavation range from 20.5 parts per million in the north end and 77.7 parts <br /> per million in the south end, gasoline range, Hydocarbon concentrations in the soil <br /> taken from the borings (MW 1, 2 and 3) are non-detected. Hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations in the ground water sampled from the monitor wells range from <br /> non-detected in MW 2 & 3 and non-detected to 40 parts per million, gasoline range, <br /> in MW 1. No floating product was observed in the excavations or the monitor wells <br /> durinWestern Geo-Engineers investigation (other than the thin fluorescent skim bor <br /> from ing of MW#1). <br /> page 36 <br /> I <br />