Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 7d- 7 <br /> iABLE B <br /> �Jlewc � �, 4& 14 Section II Closures <br /> In addition, the following information and appropriate data for Appendix A <br /> shall be submitted when evaluating Case 2 Closures. All conditions listed in <br /> Case #2 (page 9) must be met. <br /> SITE HISTORY <br /> Describe the size, aye, condition, use and Ly9a of tank removed, and <br /> submit a map showing the former tanrsystem and existing buildings on <br /> site. <br /> Submit an evaluation of the inventory records reviewed for the three <br /> months prior to removal in order to estimate the quantity of product <br /> �pt,dF rd _ ,� released. <br /> 7-4r 4177 Submit a summary of past site information, such as precision test <br /> � ,I results, tank repairs or construction activities. <br /> What types of businesses operated a;. this site previously? <br /> What was the product volume pumped per month for each tank? <br /> 6. Submit a survey of nearby wells. <br /> 7. List other sources of site specific information checked (e.g. Utility <br /> Company, Public Works Department, US and State Geologic Surveys, State <br /> and County Health Department, County and Regional Planning, local fire f <br /> departments, etc.). <br /> SITE CHARACTERISTICS <br /> 1. Describe evidence of leakage present (e.g. stained soil, free product, <br /> odors, etc. ). <br /> 2. Describe visible preferential pathways (sand lens, root holes, etc.) in <br /> the excavation pits. <br /> 3. Submit site map of surface waterbodies (ponds, creeks, stream, etc..) or <br /> possible subsurface conduits (sewers, septic tanks, utility lines, etc.) <br /> j in the vicinity of the site. <br /> SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> (If the answer to any of the following i,' NO, full explanations are required) <br /> 1. Were additional samples (other than the minimum required) taken where <br /> obviously contaminated soil was present? <br /> 2. Did sampling and analytical protocols conform to standards described in <br /> LUFT and this document? <br /> 3. Were the appropriate laboratory analyses used (see Table 2)? <br /> 4. Were the laboratory analysis and QA/QC results submitted? <br /> 5. In cases of high water table, a) were samples taken from the sidewalls <br /> and b) was water present in the excavation pit? <br /> 6. Were soil samples taken for every 20 lineal feet of underground piping? <br /> 7. Were depth and location of soil samples submitted? <br /> -21- <br />