Laserfiche WebLink
Third Quarter 199.8 Status,Report'—Former Discovery Chevrolet <br /> k, J. September 14, 1998 <br /> i <br /> indicates that the product piping that ran from the gasoline USTs to the 'dispenser, located <br /> inside the service_ bays, was left in .place beneath the concrete apron outside the shop <br /> building. <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in-all soil samples collected during-the UST removal. <br /> } Soil samples collected from :the `gasoline UST. excavation- contained. Total, Petroleum <br /> Hydrocarbons.as gasoline (TPHg) at concentrations ranging from 920 to 4,400 part per . <br /> million (ppm). Benzene was detected in all these soil samples at concentrations ranging from <br /> 5.9.to 39 ppm. Total lead Was detected,in two of these soil samples at concentrations of 19 <br /> and 4.0 ppin. TPHg arid-benzene were detected in the soil-'sample collected beneath the <br /> product dispenser at concentrations of, 21 'and 0.88 ppm,, respectively. TPHg, .Total - <br /> Petroleum Hydrocarbons as•-Diesel (TPHd), and benzene were detected in the soil sample <br /> from the waste oil excavation at concentrations of 31, 270 and 0.18 ppm; 'respectively., <br /> `.Tetrachlororoethene (72 parts per billion,'or.ppb), lead (7:8 ppm); and chromium (9.2 ppm) . <br /> were also detected in this sample.' ; <br /> Based on results of. 'soil sample analyses from the UST removal, GSI performed a <br /> preliminary site assessment to further evaluate hydrocarbons in the soil and to evaluate <br /> whether hydrocarbons had impacted groundwater beneath the . site. Three on-site. <br /> groundwater monitoring wells,were installed at the locations shown on the Site Plan-(Figure <br /> . 12) in.Se tember 1994. One soil sample' from approximately b s in each soil boring was. <br /> submitted for analysis: TPHg were detected in the soil sample from boring MW-1 (340 <br /> ppm) and MW-2(240 ppiri).. The benzene.concentrations in these samples were 3.9 and 2.4 <br /> pprn, respectively. Petroleum hydrocarbons.were not detected in the soil sample from boring <br /> ng <br /> Groundwater in the newly installed,wells was'measured between 9.97 and'10.49 feet <br /> bgs, and appeared to flow north-northeast at a,gradient of 0:003: Floating product was not <br /> observed in the monitoring wells. .TPHg was detected in the groundwater sample collected <br /> from well MW-1` (640 parts, per billion , or ppb)'.and MW-2, (7,200-ppb). The benzene <br /> concentrations.in these-samples were 35 and 370 ppb, respectively. Petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> were not detected in the groundwater. sample collected from well.MW-3. Results of that <br /> investigation were .reported:.in GSI. Report No: 8146.701-1, Preliminary Environmental <br /> Investigation Report, dated December 7, 1994. . Depth-to-groundwater and chemical <br /> analytical data are summarized in T.able 1. . <br /> ` Quarterly monitoring and sampling of -the monitoring wells begin . in March 1995.. <br /> 'Historically, depth to groundwater, has fluctuated between 9.25 -and 11.53 feet bgs: - <br /> Groundwater appears to flow toward the north-northwest at a gradient of approximately <br /> : 0.003 to 0:005. Floating'product has not been observed in the monitoring wells.: TPHg, <br /> BTEX, or Oil and Grease have riot been detected. in well MW-3. TPHg or benzene have <br /> nev.er been detected in-well MW-5'. TPHg concentrations in wells MW-1 and MW-2 have <br /> ranged from '60 to 17,000 ppb, and benzene concentrations have ranged from 1:1,to•3,100 <br /> 948146.45-7 2 <br />