Laserfiche WebLink
MPDS-L1N0788-09 <br /> December 12,1996 <br /> Page 8 of 9 <br /> Table 2 <br /> Summary of Laboratory Analyses <br /> Water <br /> 5123191 U-I ND 60 56 ND ND 1.0 <br /> U-2 ND 350 10 ND 13 57 <br /> U-3 ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> U-4 50§ ND ND ND ND ND <br /> U-5 180§ 3,200 42 240 68 440 <br /> U-6 280§ 240 17 6.0 3.0 22 <br /> 2114191 U-1 ND 140 10 ND ND 2.1 <br /> U-2 ND 230 6.9 ND 4.5 35 <br /> U-3 ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> t Sequoia Analytical Laboratory reported that the hydrocarbons detected did not appear to be gasoline. <br /> o Sequoia Analytical Laboratory reported that the hydrocarbons detected did not appear to be diesel. <br /> ♦• Sequoia Analytical Laboratory reported that the hydrocarbons detected appeared to be a diesel <br /> and non-diesel mixture. <br /> • • The concentrations reported as diesel for samples U-6, U-7, and U-8 are due to the presence of <br /> a combination of diesel and a discrete peak not indicative of diesel fuel. <br /> * PetroIeum hydrocarbons detected as TPH-D appear to be heavier than Diesel. <br /> ** Petroleum hydrocarbons reported as TPH-D appear to be lighter than Diesel. <br /> *** Petroleum hydrocarbons reported as TPH-D appear to be due to a combination of heavier <br /> and lighter hydrocarbons. <br /> Tested on May 26, 1993 -All EPA method 8270 target analytes were non-detectable. <br /> § Laboratory reports atypical chromatograph pattern. <br /> ND = Non-detectable. <br /> Results are in micrograms per liter (µg/L), unless otherwise indicated. <br /> • <br />