My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012711
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
4800
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
TA-00-09
>
SU0012711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2019 3:46:33 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 9:46:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012711
PE
2685
FACILITY_NAME
TA-00-09
STREET_NUMBER
4800
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
APN
17726005
ENTERED_DATE
12/23/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
4800 S AIRPORT WAY
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AIRPORT\4800\TA-00-09\SPEC PP.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• ' LSAAS50C1ATE5,INC. INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION <br /> JULY 2000 STOCKTON METROPOLITAN AIRPORT <br /> F SPECIAL PURPOSE PLAN <br /> I <br /> Potentially <br /> Potentially Significant Less Than <br /> Significant Unless Significant No <br /> I Impact Mitigated Impact Impact <br /> IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING--Would the <br /> Project: <br /> a) Physically divide an established community? <br /> X <br /> € b) Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy,or <br /> regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project <br /> E (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific <br /> i plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted <br /> for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an <br /> environmental effect? X <br /> c Conflict with an applicable habitat conservation <br /> y pp plan <br /> or natural community conservationplan? X <br /> X. MINERAL RESOURCES--Would theproject: <br /> a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral <br /> resource that would be of value to the region and the <br /> residents of the state? X <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important <br /> mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local <br /> _general plan, specific plan or other land use lan? X <br /> XI. NOISE--Would the project result in: <br /> i a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in <br /> t excess of standards established in the local general plan <br /> or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other <br /> y <br /> agencies? X <br /> b} Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive <br /> groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X <br /> c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise <br /> levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without <br /> the ro'ect? X <br /> ' d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in <br /> ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels <br /> existing without theproject? X <br /> e) For a project located within an airport land use plan <br /> or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two <br /> miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the <br /> f project expose people residing or working in the project <br /> area to excessive noise levels? X <br /> 7R0100(P:1SJC0301Environmentalliniiial studympd) <br /> 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.