Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> February 15,-2006 <br /> k NOA Project Number: E06006A <br /> 4.2 Potential Ground Water Contamination Issues <br /> 1 <br /> Identifying potential ground water contamination sources was not part of the scope of work for the <br /> F1soil suitability study. <br /> Potential ground water contamination can occur from a number of sources which often include <br /> Fi leaky underground storage tanks, agricultural activities, dairies,.septic systems, and storm water <br /> infiltration: Any past agricultural activities and the present use of septic systems in the area should <br /> be considered potential ground water contamination sources. <br /> 4.3 Water Sample Location <br /> No well permits were found €or the subject property address of 9103 South Airport Way during file <br /> 4 review at EHD on January 31, 2006. -However, one domestic well and one agricultural well are <br /> located on the Site. The locations of the wells are indicated on PlateJ. <br /> One water sample was taken on January 31,-2006 from the closest spigot to the domestic well on the <br /> northeast side of the residence. The location of the sample is depicted ori Plate 1. <br /> 4.4 Water Sample Constituents <br /> The water sample was analyzed for nitrate and DBCP. Nitrate was found at 114;mg/L-N031 well <br /> F1 above the maximum contaminant level{MCL) set by the US EPA'of 45 mg/L-NO3. DBCP was not <br /> detected in the water sample. The analytical reports prepared by.FGL Environmental can be found <br /> in the appendix of this report. <br /> The presence of nitrates is riot uncommon in shallow ground water aquifers in San Joaquin County <br /> and other parts of the Central Valley. :Nitrate in ground water occurs as a result of the application <br /> of fertilizers,livestock waste, and untreated septic tank waste. Nitrate is mobile and often <br /> accumulates in the shallow ground water zones. <br /> In the early 1900s,natural levels of nitrate in ground water were measured in forty-three (43) wells <br /> throughout the Sacramento Valley by Bryan(1923). It was thought that ground water at that time <br /> y was close to "natural" conditions. Based on the work by Bryan, it is estimated that under"natural" <br /> conditions,ground water concentrationcontaining nitrate is no more then about 13.5 mg/L-NO3(3 <br /> mg/L-N). Areas having 24.75 mg/L-NO3 (5.5 mg/L-N) or more are those in which nitrate <br /> {"4 concentrations may be increasing (Hull, 1984). <br /> a <br /> R <br /> 5 <br />