My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005874 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
9103
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0400215
>
SU0005874 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:50 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 9:47:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0005874
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0400215
STREET_NUMBER
9103
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
FRENCH CAMP
Zip
95231
APN
17705010
ENTERED_DATE
1/11/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9103 S AIRPORT WAY
RECEIVED_DATE
1/10/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AIRPORT\9103\PA-0400215\SU0005874\NL STUDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�'• RP` ^F co SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> � E {: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue P Floor Stockton-CA 95202-2708 <br /> "r' { uin.ca.us/ehd <br /> 3420 468 <br /> 209 <br /> { ) - -Fax:{209)464-0138• Web:www.co.san-joaquin.ca.us/ehd <br /> R % .1 q <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> r <br /> SITE LOCATION: a lL'—uyA-� F. C_ PA#: 0 Lf- 2,1_5 <br /> It i So-6 <br /> REPORT DATE:: 2- { <br /> S = Sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> t = insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ❑�❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> © ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> ❑' ❑ 2.1 Description of:depth to groundwater,seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth,directional flow and gradient. <br /> El2.2 <br /> 2.2of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. <br /> ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ED'� ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> �" ❑ <br /> 443.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. ! <br /> ❑ <br /> R ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> r�f these sources to the project site. <br /> 01 ,) <br /> EA <br /> EJ3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrateload from these sources to the project site, <br /> 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore,or other appropriate formula/model,if applicable. <br /> EEl 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells,rivers,lakes etc. <br /> fV_ r�- 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> 10 OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ? � ❑ ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> ❑✓ ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern,at and/or around the project site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ❑�/` ❑ 5.1 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ❑ ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: <br /> y Reviewed Date: <br /> i <br /> S <br /> E H D 26-02-002 Page 1 of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> 7/1412003 <br /> F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.