My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005202 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
9542
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500420
>
SU0005202 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:32 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 9:47:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0005202
PE
2631
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500420
STREET_NUMBER
9542
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
MANTECA
APN
17708010
ENTERED_DATE
7/18/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9542 S AIRPORT WAY
RECEIVED_DATE
7/15/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AIRPORT\9542\PA-0500420\SU0005202\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
;o'`� "`•.ea SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> z: ? ENS ONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMj_NT <br /> a <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, 3`d Floor, Stockton, CA 95202-2708 <br /> Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fax:(209)464-0138 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> IJ�f �f� 1 X5336 PA M b s -yon � Cir-47? <br /> SITE LOCATION: /�f rOr� it!f�.� ` r 014ec r W�� REPORT DATE: z3zgob <br /> d <br /> 2-647 <br /> S = sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> 1 = Insufficient <br /> S 1 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOI 429 <br /> [� ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site: Ct$ SSS <br /> ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site $ .2_�) <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> � �-� C `•H. � � SSS) <br /> [� ❑ 2.1 Description of: depth to groundwat asonal fluctuations of groundwater depth, directional flow and gradient. <br /> d ❑ 2.2 Descript• n/discussion of any existing or pot tial groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. L a- SSs� <br /> ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> sed development project <br /> (W3 the propo ment p P 1 (W3) <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER 1 3 <br /> ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site.(-(y3) Cs� � 3.y 555) <br /> [� ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. ii <br /> d [] 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sourcesZitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. [ Y <br /> ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering atf potential sources identified. Use <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. NJC <br /> down gradient , vers la s-eet . <br /> [� ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site protect to do g , �� <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LO DING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOLD METHOD <br /> .OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL CW P <br /> [� ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project_ <br /> ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or anv other constituent of concern, at and/or around the proiect site 6 a--7 <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> E� ❑ 5.1 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional Fg 7- <br /> 5.2 The affachmentslappendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. C4T 7) <br /> Reviewed By: a Reviewed Date: <br /> HHD 26-02 Page 1 of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.