My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007889 SSC RPT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ALDER
>
19298
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0900196
>
SU0007889 SSC RPT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2019 1:13:43 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 9:48:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSC RPT
RECORD_ID
SU0007889
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0900196
STREET_NUMBER
19298
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
ALDER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
TRACY
APN
21319002
ENTERED_DATE
8/31/2009 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
19298 S ALDER AVE
RECEIVED_DATE
8/28/2009 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\ALDER\19298\SU0007889\SSC RPT.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and goats [8,96]. It is practically nontoxic by skin exposure, with reported dermal LD50 values <br /> of greater than 5000 mg/kg for the acid and isopropylamine salt. The trimethylsulfonium salt has <br /> a reported dermal LD50 of greater than 2000 mg/kg. It is reportedly not irritating to the skin of <br /> rabbits, and does not induce skin sensitization in guinea pigs [58]. It does cause eye irritation in <br /> rabbits [58]. Some formulations may cause much more extreme irritation of the skin or eyes <br /> [58]. In a number of human volunteers, patch tests produced no visible skin changes or <br /> sensitization [58]. The reported 4-hour rat inhalation LC50 values for the technical acid and salts <br /> were 5 to 12 mg/L [58], indicating moderate toxicity via this route. Some formulations may <br /> show high acute inhalation toxicity [58]. While it does contain a phosphatyl functional group, it <br /> is not structually similar to organophosphate pesticides which contain organophosphate esters, <br /> and it does not significantly inhibit cholinesterase activity [1,58]. <br /> • Chronic toxicity: Studies of glyphosate lasting up to 2 years, have been conducted with rats, <br /> dogs, mice, and rabbits, and with few exceptions no effects were observed [96]. For example, in <br /> a chronic feeding study with rats, no toxic effects were observed in rats given doses as high as <br /> 400 mg/kg/day [58]. Also, no toxic effects were observed in a chronic feeding study with dogs <br /> fed up to 500 mg/kg/day, the highest dose tested [58,97]. <br /> • Reproductive effects: Laboratory studies show that glyphosate produces reproductive changes <br /> in test animals very rarely and then only at very high doses (over 150 mg/kg/day) [58,96]. It is <br /> unlikely that the compound would produce reproductive effects in humans. <br /> a Teratogenic effects: In a teratology stud with rabbits no developmental� g gy y e opmental toxicity was observed <br /> in the fetuses at the highest dose tested (350 mg/kg/day) [97]. Rats given doses up to 175 <br /> mg/kg/day on days 6 to 19 of pregnancy had offspring with no teratogenic effects, but other <br /> toxic effects were observed in both the mothers and the fetuses. No toxic effects to the fetuses <br /> occurred at 50 mg/kg/day [97]. Glyphosate does not appear to be teratogenic. <br /> • Mutagenic effects: Glyphosate mutagenicity and genotoxicity assays have been negative [58]. <br /> These included the Ames test, other bacterial assays, and the Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) <br /> cell culture, rat bone marrow cell culture, and mouse dominant lethal assays [58]. It appears that <br /> glyphosate is not mutagenic. <br /> • Carcinogenic effects: Rats given oral doses of up to 400 mg/kg/day did not show any signs of <br /> cancer, nor did dogs given oral doses of up to 500 mg/kg/day or mice fed glyphosate at doses of <br /> up to 4500 mg/kg/day [58]. It appears that glyphosate is not carcinogenic [97]. <br /> Organ toxicity: Some microscopic liver and kidney changes, but no observable differences in <br /> function or toxic effects, have been seen after lifetime administration of glyphosate to test <br /> animals [97]. <br /> • Fate in humans and animals: Glyphosate is poorly absorbed from the digestive tract and is <br /> largely excreted unchanged by mammals. At 10 days after treatment,there were only minute <br /> amounts in the tissues of rats fed glyphosate for 3 weeks [98]. Cows, chickens, and pigs fed <br /> small amounts of glyphosate had undetectable levels(less than 0.05 ppm) in muscle tissue and <br /> i . fat. Levels in milk and eggs were also undetectable (less than 0.025 ppm). Glyphosate has no <br /> significant potential to accumulate in animal tissue [99]. <br /> Ecological Effects: <br /> + Effects on birds: Glyphosate is slightly toxic to wild birds. The dietary LC50 in both mallards <br /> and bobwhite quail is greater than 4500 ppm [1]. <br /> • Effects on aquatic organisms: Technical glyphosate acid is practically nontoxic to fish and may <br /> be slightly toxic to aquatic invertebrates. The 96-hour LC50 is 120 mg/L in bluegill sunfish, 168 <br /> mg/L in harlequin, and 86 mg/L in rainbow trout [58]. The reported 96-hour LC50 values for <br /> other aquatic species include greater than 10 mg/L in Atlantic oysters, 934 mg/L in fiddler crab, <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.