Laserfiche WebLink
Nitrate Loading Study Irerracon <br /> Valencia Property ■ Ripon, California <br /> September 6, 2018 ■ Terracon Project No. NA187044 <br /> 1.2 Mass Transport Soil Properties <br /> The below additional information pertaining to mass transport for each soil type was obtained <br /> from the USDA sources listed in Section 1.1. <br /> Timor loamy sandy soils comprise approximately 93% of site soils and are located across the <br /> majority of the site. The soils consist of moderately well drained soils, have rapid permeability, <br /> and slow runoff. The rate of water in-take in irrigated areas is anticipated at 3.0 inches per hour. <br /> For homesite development with septic tank absorption fields, the main limitations are depth to <br /> hardpan, approximately 4 feet below grade surface (bgs), and rapid permeability. Hardpan can <br /> be broken up by chiseling or ripping which may improve leach field absorption. <br /> Chuloak coarse sandy loam soils comprise approximately 5% of soils near the southeastern <br /> corner of the site and have moderately slow permeability. For homesite development with septic <br /> tank absorption fields,the main limitation is slow to moderate permeability which can be overcome <br /> by increasing the size of the leach field. <br /> Delhi loamy sandy soils are located at the southwestern corner of the site and comprise <br /> approximately 2% of the site soils. The soils are somewhat excessively drained and have rapid <br /> permeability with slow runoff. The rate of water in-take in irrigated areas is anticipated at 3.0 <br /> inches per hour. For homesite development with septic tank absorption fields, the main limitations <br /> are rapid permeability and poor filtration. A tillage pan may form if soil is tilled when wet; however, <br /> the pan may be broken up by chiseling or ripping. <br /> The longer effluent remains near the surface, the more treatment is enhanced due to natural <br /> processes within the soil. Based on the loamy sandy soils and rapid permeability anticipated for <br /> the majority of the surface soils on the site, the potential for effluent to remain near the surface is <br /> low; therefore, there is a potential leaching from sewage effluent or other surface contaminants <br /> may affect groundwater. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> 2.1 Regional Groundwater <br /> Based on a review of the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District <br /> Groundwater Report, from 2015 to 2016, Spring & Fall depth to groundwater near the site was <br /> between approximately 50 and 60 feet logs. Based on a review of groundwater data available on <br /> the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Water Data Library, between the years <br /> 2015 and 2018, depth to groundwater measured between approximately 45 to 58 feet bgs at <br /> groundwater wells located approximately one mile north and east of the site. The groundwater <br /> flow direction and the depth to shallow, unconfined groundwater, if present, would likely vary <br /> depending upon seasonal variations in rainfall and other hydrogeological features. Without the <br /> benefit of on-site groundwater monitoring wells surveyed to a datum, groundwater depth and flow <br /> direction beneath the site cannot be directly ascertained. <br /> Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 4 <br />