Laserfiche WebLink
Nitrate Loading Study Irerracon <br /> Cho Property ■ Ripon, Califomia <br /> September 6. 2018 ■ Terracon Proiect No. NA187038 <br /> 1.2 Mass Transport Soil Properties <br /> The below additional information pertaining to mass transport for each soil type was obtained <br /> from the USDA sources listed in Section 1.1. <br /> Delhi loamy sandy soils are located across approximately 82% of the northwestern portion of the <br /> site and consist of somewhat excessively drained soils. Delhi loamy sandy soils have rapid <br /> permeability and slow runoff. The rate of water in-take in irrigated areas is anticipated at 3.0 <br /> inches per hour. For homesite development with septic tank absorption fields,the main limitations <br /> are rapid permeability and poor filtration. A tillage pan may form if soil is tilled when wet; however, <br /> the pan may be broken up by chiseling or ripping. <br /> Timor loamy sandy soils comprise approximately 12% of soils near the southwestern corner of <br /> the site and consist of moderately well drained soils. Timor loamy sandy soils have rapid <br /> permeability and slow runoff. The rate of water in-take in irrigated areas is anticipated at 3.0 <br /> inches per hour. For homesite development with septic tank absorption fields,the main limitations <br /> are depth to hardpan, approximately 4 feet below grade surface (bgs), and rapid permeability. <br /> Hardpan can be broken up by chiseling or ripping which may improve leach field absorption. <br /> Chuloak coarse sandy loam soils comprise approximately 6% of soils near the southwestern <br /> comer of the site and have moderately slow permeability. For homesite development with septic <br /> tank absorption fields, the main limitation is slow to moderate permeability which can be overcome <br /> by increasing the size of the leach field. <br /> The longer effluent remains near the surface, the more treatment is enhanced due to natural <br /> processes within the soil. Based on the loamy sandy soils and rapid permeability anticipated for <br /> the majority of the surface soils on the site, the potential for effluent to remain near the surface is <br /> low; therefore, there is a potential leaching from sewage effluent or other surface contaminants <br /> may affect groundwater. <br /> 20 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> 2.1 Regional Groundwater <br /> Based on a review of the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District <br /> Groundwater Report; from 2015 to 2016; Spring & Fall depth to groundwater near the site was <br /> between approximately 50 and 60 feet bgs. Based on a review of groundwater data available on <br /> the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Water Data Library, between the years <br /> 2015 and 2018, depth to groundwater measured between approximately 45 to 58 feet bgs at <br /> groundwater wells located approximately one mile north and east of the site. The groundwater <br /> flow direction and the depth to shallow, unconfined groundwater, if present, would likely vary <br /> depending upon seasonal variations in rainfall and other hydrogeological features. Without the <br /> benefit of on-site groundwater monitoring wells surveyed to a datum, groundwater depth and flow <br /> direction beneath the site cannot be directly ascertained. <br /> Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 4 <br />