My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004984 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ALPINE
>
767
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500194
>
SU0004984 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:22 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 9:52:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0004984
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500194
STREET_NUMBER
767
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
ALPINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
APN
10126007
ENTERED_DATE
4/13/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
767 N ALPINE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
4/12/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\ALPINE\767\PA-0500194\SU0004984\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F t t' <br /> F. IV. CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR <br /> NITRATE LOADING MITIGATION <br /> The Hantzsche/Finnemore Formula predicts a resultant average nitrate-nitrogen concentration in the <br /> ,, effluent recharge water from the proposed project to be 5.2 ppm as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), or 23.2 <br /> ppm as nitrate (NO3). Based upon this Formula, the nitrate impact from the proposed development <br /> will be approximately one-half the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for nitrate contamination of <br /> F drinking water. This calculated impact of 5.2 ppm has taken into account three, new single family <br /> residences and the existing residence at the east end of the property. If second unit dwellings were . <br /> allowed to be built on each of the three proposed parcels, this may theoretically increase the nitrate <br /> concentration in the effluent recharge water close to, but not above the MCL. The calculations shown <br /> below illustrate the nitrate impact from second unit dwellings containing four persons, as was <br /> Fcalculated in the Hantzsche/ Finnemore Formula above for the primary residences: <br /> 68 gals/person/day gals/person/dayx 4 people per household x 6 new houses+ 1 existin house/7.32 Ac x 365 d/)E 3.50 in/yr. <br /> I= 43,560 cu ft/Ac ft x 7.48 gal/cu ft x (I ft/12 in) <br /> i <br /> 3.50 in/yl(53„my NIL) (1 -0.251+(13.5 in/yr x 0.1 mg/L) <br /> Nr = (3,50 in/yr+ 13.5 in/yr) <br /> Nr = 8.3 ppm as NO,-N or 37.0 ppm as NO, <br /> Since concentration is reported in parts per million, which is a mass-to-mass ratio, the percolating <br /> effluent from the proposed project of three new residential parcels and one existing parcel may <br /> theoretically contribute to a dilution effect within the water table mixing layer. <br /> If it is assumed that the underlying top aquifer, or water table possesses a nitrate concentration of 52 <br /> ppm N031 then percolating effluent on a mass-to-mass ratio basis will theoretically dilute a 5.72 inch <br /> depth of the water table groundwater to the following extent: 2.00 in/yr recharge x 27,154 gals/ac-in. <br /> x 7.32 ac = 398,000 gallons/yr @ 23.2 ppm NO3 recharge water f 27,154 gals/ac-in x 5.72 inches x <br /> 7.32 ac x 35%porosity= 398,000 gallons @ 52 ppm NO3 = 37.6 ppm NO3s which reduces <br /> EF. approximately six inches of the water table nitrate concentration below the MCL. <br /> From the USDA Soil Map aerial photo, it can be noted that the housing development on the south <br /> side of Orford Road and agricultural production land to the south are upgradient to the subject <br /> property. In all probability, both of these land uses are contributing nitrate to the upper groundwater. <br /> Without highly.sophisticated testing and modeling, it would be impossible to predict the percentages <br /> Fill <br /> each source contributes to the nitrate concentration that was observed in the on-site well. No well log <br /> was available for this well. It is assumed to have been drilled in the 1950s, probably to a <br />` comparatively shallow depth which may explain the high nitrate concentration and the presence of <br /> F; DBCP. <br /> 10 <br /> ! y' <br /> Chesney. Consulting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.