My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0003465 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ARBOR
>
6551
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0300525
>
SU0003465 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:29:55 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 9:54:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0003465
PE
2690
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0300525
STREET_NUMBER
6551
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ARBOR
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
4/30/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
6551 W ARBOR AVE
RECEIVED_DATE
10/30/2003 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\ARBOR\6551\PA-0300525\SU0003465\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The denitrification capacity of the soil is predominately dependant upon the abundance of an <br /> organic carbon substrate (which is comparatively high), high soil moisture content leading to an <br /> anaerobic environment, and a high soil pH of 7.8. Saturated soil conditions will develop near the <br /> soil/effluent interface. There should be sufficient organic carbon substrate from the wastewater <br /> and an alkaline soil pH may further promote denitrification. The following Table illustrates the <br /> soil analytical test results. Additionally, as will be discussed in Section II.C.1., groundwater l <br /> samples were also taken from the backhoe test pit, with the results listed underneath the Soil <br /> Nitrogen Content. As expected, the nitrate concentration in the groundwater under the high <br /> nitrate-nitrogen soil is significantly higher than the groundwater nitrate concentration under the <br /> soil with a much lower nitrate-nitrogen concentration. <br /> TABLE 2 <br /> 'RO <br /> €6 sOI al ,F'ILE C� RACTERISTICS AND <br /> x 9 a8u�c �R#€a s - S4 3=i€ z<€£ "»-., __ i4 <br /> ANALYTICAI�TESTESUL' ' aOR`NITRAT"E"NITROGN"3 <br /> �PARCEhI, SOIL DESCRIPT'IOi�T� SANT),€SLLTA�iD CLAY; SOILNITROGN'CONTETT . <br /> 3€ � ,'q�s € ' � €a¢el�I GRO I�DVVAT R <br /> 6, I'EI,2CENTGESa� ,��: ;: E <br /> €sae SI�s.. :f" 1€ E . <br /> a6 •„%a'7i <br /> LO.G r I I(N 1V I'w<R T CONTENT <br /> e.� <br /> $ €a<#r 9 a° ..mLa .: "3°a ¢r -(:•.0 .'' 1 g, 5• <br /> C4•eFF <br /> Parcel 2: Sandy Loam 55%,30%, 15% 38 ppm NO3-N <br /> Sample No._ <br /> 38 IN.Depth (165 ppm NO,) <br /> Future L.F. <br /> Parcet2: Sandy Loam 59%,22%, 19% 46 ppm NO3-N <br /> Sample No. _ <br /> 8FT Depth (165 ppm NO,) <br /> Future L.F. <br /> Parcel 3: Loam 47%,26%,27% 3 ppm NO3-N <br /> Sample No. _ <br /> PAR 3 (8 ppm NO3) <br /> (42 inch depth) <br /> Future L.P. <br /> 2. PERCOLATION TESTING AND SEPTIC SYSTEM PARAMETERS <br /> Percolation testing was performed in accordance with San Joaquin County Department of <br /> Environmental Health regulations. Test borings for parcels 2 and 5 were drilled February 1 I with <br /> a four-inch diameter hand auger. Two inches of pea gravel and a three inch perforated pipe was <br /> placed in each boring. Twelve inches of tap water was then poured in each boring. The same <br /> procedures were used for the perc tests on parcels 1, 3 and 4, with the perc test borings hand- <br /> drilled on March 4 and perc tested March 5. All test borings were dry and the holes intact at the <br /> start of the testing. The attached Site Plans denotes the location of the percolation tests and the <br /> FIELD PERCOLATION TE5TING REPORT illustrates the perc test results, which are summarized in <br /> the Table below. <br /> 5 <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.