SU0007861 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page II-26 Forward Inc. Landfill 2014 Expansion Project resources due to loss of Continued recharge of extracted and treated groundwater. Although the recharge surface area. existing recharge program being carried out by Forward Inc. does not specifically address the loss of infiltration within the expansion area it is designed to generally meet the intent of the water district to minimize overdrafting. F.B. The expansion of the Less than significant. None required. Less than landfill would result in Significant the removal of existing groundwater monitoring wells. G. SOILS AND GEOLOGY G.1. Seismic shaking Proposed as Part of the Project: Less than could impair or Significant otherwise compromise The project sponsor has prepared a seismicity study for the site, with details both the existing and in Appendix D of the Geotechnical Investigation Report(Geo-Logic, 2008a, proposed (for the new 2008b) and the Geosyntec (1999)report. If the potential maximum peak expansion areas) Class II ground acceleration in the seismicity study is greater than that assumed in liner and associated the preliminary design, the final project design analysis will make leachate collection modifications needed to meet the factor of safety (determinations may be system integrity, causing subject to the approval of the CalRecycle and/or RWQCB). Impacts to the slope instability, damage new liner and drainage system installed will be monitored as appropriate to drainage features, or based on any stipulations of the CalRecycle and/or RWQCB. differential settlement of the landfill over the life of the project, or following closure. G.2. Slope instability Proposed as Part of the Project: Less than caused by an earthquake Significant could result in damage to Overall reduction—or, in some cases, elimination or improvement—of existing and proposed slope instability at the project site can be achieved through the