Laserfiche WebLink
ll <br /> Page 62 a ll <br /> c volumes intersection geometry and control <br /> Intermodal Facility Protect,Apel 1999). Background traffic g try <br /> are presented in Figures D-3a and D-3b. <br /> Intersection Level of Service Analysis <br /> The operating conditions of all the study intersections were evaluated under background conditions. The <br /> results of the analysis are summarized in Table D4.' <br /> Table D-4 <br /> Intersection Level of Service Summary <br /> Existing Condition Background Condition <br /> No. Intersection Critical AM PEAK PM PEAK AM PEAK PM PEAK <br /> Movement <br /> Avera LOS Avera LOS Avera LOS Avera LOS <br /> ge ge ge ge <br /> Delay Delay Delay Delay <br /> 1. Austin NBL 9.6 B 7.1 B 84.2 1+ 13.4 C <br /> Rd/MariposaSBL n/a - n/a - 16.2 C 15.5 C <br /> Rd' <br /> EBL n/a - n/a - 3.8 A 2.7 A <br /> WBL 2.8 A 3.1 A 3.6 A 4.6 A <br /> ALL 9.6 B 7.1 B 84.2 F 15.5 C <br /> 2. Austin NBL 2.4 A 2.2 A 3.9 A 3.1 A <br /> Rd/Arch Rd' WBL n/a - n/a - 2.7. A 2.3 A <br /> EBL 4.0 A 4.0 A 17.0 C 15.9 C <br /> WBL n/a - n/a - 16.7 C 17.9 C <br /> ALL 4.0 A 4.0 A 17.0 C 17.9 C <br /> 3. Austin NBL 4.9 A 4.6 A 17.3 C 6.7 B <br /> Rd/French WBL 5.3 B 5.5 B 10.8 C 9.8 B <br /> Camp Rd EBL 2.8 A 2.4 A 3.6 A 2.6 A <br /> WBL 2.3 A 2.8- A 2.3 A 2.8 A <br /> ALL 5.3 B 5.5 B 17.3 C 9.8 B - <br /> 4. Austin NBL 2.2 A 2.2 A 2.5 A 4.0 A <br /> Rd/Landfill EBL 3.7 A 3.8 A 8.8 B 9.7 B <br /> Access Rd ALL 3.7 A 3.8 A 8.8 A 9.7 B <br /> L Intersection becomes four leg under background conditions. <br /> Worst case delay and level of service for approach and for whole intersection reported. <br /> The LOS calculations for the background condition are provided in Appendix B. <br /> a <br /> GRASSETTI ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING <br />