Laserfiche WebLink
Page 88 <br /> Impact F.11. Implementation of the project could result in significant adverse impacts to <br /> Sacramento splittail. <br /> Sacramento splittail is a federally-proposed threatened species and is a California Species of Special <br /> Concern. Sacramento splittail is endemic to the Central Valley of California. USFWS states that there is a <br /> low likelihood this fish occurs in Little Johns Creek in a nearby project site(taken from Biological <br /> Impacts and Mitigations Proposed BNSF Intermodal Facility, Stockton, California, March 23, 1999,M. <br /> Thabault,Pers. comm. with G. Monk,July 3, 1997). However,USFWS acknowledges that this fish could <br /> possibly get as far upstream in Little Johns Creek at the project site during wet years(following <br /> Biological Impacts and Mitigations Proposed BNSF In termodal Facility, Stockton, California, March 23, <br /> 1999; S.Brady pens, comae. with G. Monk,Scptember,24, 1998). Potential impacts to this species <br /> include temporary disturbance to the creek from realignment resulting in a temporary loss of a potential <br /> migration corridor. The realignment would eventually result in an increased.area of and better quality <br /> habitat that would be beneficial to fish species. <br /> No surveys have been conducted for Sacramento splittail in the reach of Little Johns Creek on the project <br /> site,and in the absence of surveys,it must be concluded that implementation of the proposed realignment <br /> could result in potentially significant adverse impacts. Mitigation could be implemented that would <br /> reduce this impact to a level considered less than significant. <br /> Mitization Measure F.11. (a) To avoid impacting Sacramento splittail populations potentially present <br /> i in Little Johns Creek,and to avoid impacts to other sensitive fish species potentially present in this creek, <br /> work in the creek should only be conducted between July 31 and September 30. If work must occur <br /> outside of these months,NMFS should be contacted. Further mitigation for non-summer work would be <br /> in accordance with recommendation provided by NMFS. Other mitigation could include conducting <br /> turbidity studies to determine if the work would be detrimental to Sacramento splittail. <br /> This mitigation(also refer to Mitigation Measure F.1)conducted in <br /> concert with any mitigation required <br /> by NMFS would reduce impacts to this fish species to a level considered less than significant. (taken from <br /> Biological Impacts and Mitigations Proposed BNSF Intermodal Facility, Stockton, California, March 23, <br /> I 1999). <br /> Impact F.12. Implementation of the project could result in significant adverse impacts to giant <br /> garter snake. <br /> The giant garter snake is state-and federally-listed as Threatened. It is likely that the USFWS and CDFG <br /> would consider the creek channel on the project site to be giant garter snake habitat based on consultation <br /> with these agencies on a nearby site on the North Branch of the South Fork of Little Johns Creek, It is not <br /> known if the portion of this creek that is on the project site is occupied by giant garter snake. Typically, a <br /> buffer extending 200-foot from the banks of occupied creek channels may be considered as upland habitat <br /> in addition to the creek channel. However,the habitat value of adjacent uplands is reduced by annual <br /> cultivation of the Brocchini property to the south, and landfill operations to the north. Therefore, the area <br /> that is assumed to provide suitable giant garter snake habitat(in the absence of surveys)is limited to the <br /> top of banks. Approximately 8.03 acres of aquatic and associated upland habitat(assuming an average <br /> floodplain width of 45 feet and a reach length of 7,600 feet)will be altered and realigned as a result of the <br /> proposed relocation of the creek. k <br /> A wetland mitigation plan has been approved for the projcct(Jones and Stokes 1996). Giant garter snake <br /> habitat issues incorporated into the plan were discussed in informal consultation with USFWS and CDFG, <br /> although the Streambed Alteration Permit has not yet been issued. (Niblock,pers. comin.) Under the <br /> approved wetland mitigation plan, a total of 35.8 acres(length of realigned reach by average floodplain <br /> GRASSEMEMiIRONMENTAL CONSULTING <br />