My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012793
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
EIR-99-2
>
SU0012793
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2020 12:22:48 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:03:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012793
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
EIR-99-2
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336-
APN
20106005
ENTERED_DATE
1/6/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\EIR-99-2\PUB REC REL APPL.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
432
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 88 <br /> Impact F.11. Implementation of the project could result in significant adverse impacts to <br /> Sacramento splittail. <br /> Sacramento splittail is a federally-proposed threatened species and is a California Species of Special <br /> Concern. Sacramento splittail is endemic to the Central Valley of California. USFWS states that there is a <br /> low likelihood this fish occurs in Little Johns Creek in a nearby project site(taken from Biological <br /> Impacts and Mitigations Proposed BNSF Intermodal Facility, Stockton, California, March 23, 1999,M. <br /> Thabault,Pers. comm. with G. Monk,July 3, 1997). However,USFWS acknowledges that this fish could <br /> possibly get as far upstream in Little Johns Creek at the project site during wet years(following <br /> Biological Impacts and Mitigations Proposed BNSF In termodal Facility, Stockton, California, March 23, <br /> 1999; S.Brady pens, comae. with G. Monk,Scptember,24, 1998). Potential impacts to this species <br /> include temporary disturbance to the creek from realignment resulting in a temporary loss of a potential <br /> migration corridor. The realignment would eventually result in an increased.area of and better quality <br /> habitat that would be beneficial to fish species. <br /> No surveys have been conducted for Sacramento splittail in the reach of Little Johns Creek on the project <br /> site,and in the absence of surveys,it must be concluded that implementation of the proposed realignment <br /> could result in potentially significant adverse impacts. Mitigation could be implemented that would <br /> reduce this impact to a level considered less than significant. <br /> Mitization Measure F.11. (a) To avoid impacting Sacramento splittail populations potentially present <br /> i in Little Johns Creek,and to avoid impacts to other sensitive fish species potentially present in this creek, <br /> work in the creek should only be conducted between July 31 and September 30. If work must occur <br /> outside of these months,NMFS should be contacted. Further mitigation for non-summer work would be <br /> in accordance with recommendation provided by NMFS. Other mitigation could include conducting <br /> turbidity studies to determine if the work would be detrimental to Sacramento splittail. <br /> This mitigation(also refer to Mitigation Measure F.1)conducted in <br /> concert with any mitigation required <br /> by NMFS would reduce impacts to this fish species to a level considered less than significant. (taken from <br /> Biological Impacts and Mitigations Proposed BNSF Intermodal Facility, Stockton, California, March 23, <br /> I 1999). <br /> Impact F.12. Implementation of the project could result in significant adverse impacts to giant <br /> garter snake. <br /> The giant garter snake is state-and federally-listed as Threatened. It is likely that the USFWS and CDFG <br /> would consider the creek channel on the project site to be giant garter snake habitat based on consultation <br /> with these agencies on a nearby site on the North Branch of the South Fork of Little Johns Creek, It is not <br /> known if the portion of this creek that is on the project site is occupied by giant garter snake. Typically, a <br /> buffer extending 200-foot from the banks of occupied creek channels may be considered as upland habitat <br /> in addition to the creek channel. However,the habitat value of adjacent uplands is reduced by annual <br /> cultivation of the Brocchini property to the south, and landfill operations to the north. Therefore, the area <br /> that is assumed to provide suitable giant garter snake habitat(in the absence of surveys)is limited to the <br /> top of banks. Approximately 8.03 acres of aquatic and associated upland habitat(assuming an average <br /> floodplain width of 45 feet and a reach length of 7,600 feet)will be altered and realigned as a result of the <br /> proposed relocation of the creek. k <br /> A wetland mitigation plan has been approved for the projcct(Jones and Stokes 1996). Giant garter snake <br /> habitat issues incorporated into the plan were discussed in informal consultation with USFWS and CDFG, <br /> although the Streambed Alteration Permit has not yet been issued. (Niblock,pers. comin.) Under the <br /> approved wetland mitigation plan, a total of 35.8 acres(length of realigned reach by average floodplain <br /> GRASSEMEMiIRONMENTAL CONSULTING <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.