Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • <br /> Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.F-22 • <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2018 Expansion Project <br /> • <br /> Habitat Tyke Fees29 • <br /> • <br /> Multi-Purpose Open Space $9,701 per acre • <br /> Natural $19,400 per acre • <br /> Agriculture $19,400 per acre . <br /> Vernal Pool-uplands $72,523 per acre • <br /> Vernal Pool- wetted $116,871 per acre • <br /> However, participation in the SJMSCP does not satisfy the requirements of the USACE, <br /> RWQCB, CDFW pertaining to impacts to surrounding waterways, wetlands, creeks, channels • <br /> and streambed alteration;permits for these impacts must be obtained separately. Similarly, • <br /> participation in the SJMSCP does not address potentially significant impacts to non-covered • <br /> species. Covered versus non-covered species potentially affected by project implementation are <br /> summarized in Table IV.F.1. • <br /> • <br /> In most cases, projects participating in the SJMSCP experience can streamline the process of • <br /> complying with endangered species laws and reduce the cost of mitigating compared with the • <br /> undertaking of separate negotiations with each regulatory agency. Participation in the SJMSCP <br /> does not,however, satisfy the requirements of the USACE, RWQCB or CDFW pertaining to • <br /> impacts to stream courses or wetlands;permits for these impacts must be obtained separately, • <br /> as discussed below. • <br /> Forward applied for the consolidated landfill to be included under the provisions of the • <br /> SJMSCP. Forward's application was approved by the Technical Advisory Committee of the San • <br /> Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) on April 10, 2002, and by the SJCOG's Board on April • <br /> 25, 2002. Therefore, provisions of the SJMSCP apply to future landfill development at the site. • <br /> California Department of Fish and Wildlife • <br /> Habitats potentially falling under the regulatory jurisdiction of CDFW are described in the • <br /> CFGC30. Absent a "Lake and Streambed Alteration agreement," as amended in 2003, CFGC • <br /> Section 1602 provides that"[a]n entity may not substantially divert or obstruct the natural flow <br /> of, or substantially change or use any material from the bed, channel, or bank of, any river, <br /> stream, or lake, or deposit or dispose of debris, waste,or other material containing crumbled, • <br /> flaked, or ground pavement where it may pass into any river, stream, or lake[.]" The CDFW • <br /> has traditionally taken a broad view of its jurisdiction under this statute and its predecessors, <br /> asserting that the definition of"stream," as used in this context, includes "intermittent and • <br /> ephemeral streams, rivers, creeks, dry washes, sloughs,blue-line streams, and watercourses • <br /> with subsurface flows. Canals, aqueducts, irrigation ditches, and other means of water • <br /> conveyance can also be considered streams if they support aquatic life, riparian vegetation, or • <br /> 29 2018 Updated Habitat Fees:http://www.sjcog org/DocumentCenterfView/3220/2018-Fees-and- • <br /> Endowment • <br /> 30 Division 2, Chapter 6,Sections 1600-1607 • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br />