|
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report PageVII-7
<br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2018 Expansion Project
<br /> • SCS Engineers, Current MSW Industry Position and State-of-the-Practice on LFG Collection
<br /> • Efficiency,Methane Oxidation,and Carbon Sequestration in Landfills, Version 2.2,
<br /> January 2009
<br /> 0 Soule,M. and M. Gilpin. 1991. The Theory of Wildlife Corridor Capability. In Nature
<br /> • Conservation 2: The Role of Corridors. Chipping Norton, NSW: Surrey Beatty &
<br /> . Sons.
<br /> Stebbins, R. C. 2003. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians. 3rd Edition.
<br /> Houghton Mifflin Company. New York, New York. 533 pp.
<br /> SWT Engineering,Joint Technical Document, Forward Landfill (SWIS NO. 39-AA-0015),
<br /> S January 2018
<br /> SWT Engineering and Republic Services, 2013, Joint Technical Document, Volume II—
<br /> • Appendices A Through G, Forward Landfill, San Joaquin County, California,
<br /> December
<br /> 0 Teichmann, Audrey. Wildlife Biologist, WRA Environmental Consultants, Letter
<br /> Report to Joseph Lipka, Environmental Manager, Re: June 2017 Biological
<br /> • Surveys at the Forward Landfill, San Joaquin County, California, June 23, 2017
<br /> • TJKM, Traffic Study for the Proposed Mariposa Lakes Development, 2007.
<br /> • United States Environmental Proection Agency (USEPA), Solid Waste Disposal Facility
<br /> Criteria Technical Manual, USEPA 530-R-93-017, 1993.
<br /> • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1967.Native Fish and Wildlife, Endangered Species.
<br /> Federal Register 32: 4001.
<br /> U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1993. Endangered and Threatened Wildife and
<br /> • Plants: Determination of Threatened Status of the Giant Garter Snake, Final Rule.
<br /> Federal Register Vol. 58, No.201.October 20, 1993.
<br /> 0 http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal register/fr2446.pdf.
<br /> 0 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1998a. Recovery Plan for Species of Upland Species
<br /> • of the San Joaquin Valley, California. Region 1 U. S Fish and Wildlife Service
<br /> Portland, Oregon. Available online at
<br /> 0 http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery plan/980930a.pdf.
<br /> 0 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1999a. "Service Lists Sacramento Splittail as
<br /> 0 Threatened Under Endangered Species Act", February 3, 1999, NC-SC-G 99-03.
<br /> • Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, USFWS-Region 1.
<br /> U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1999b. Draft Recovery Plan for the Giant Garter
<br /> Snake. Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office and The Giant Garter Snake Recovery
<br /> . Team. Prepared for Region 1 USFWS.
<br /> • httl2://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery plan/990702b.pdf
<br /> U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2006a. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and
<br /> 0 Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the California Red-Legged Frog, and Special
<br /> Rule Exemption Associated With Final Listing for Existing Routine Ranching Activities;
<br /> • Final Rule. Federal Register 71(71):19244-19292. April 13.
<br /> • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2006b. Giant Garter Snake (Thamnophis gigas)
<br /> Five year Review: Summary and Evaluation.
<br /> i http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five year review/doc778.pdf
<br /> U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2012. Federal Endangered and Threatened Species
<br /> that Occur in or May be Affected by Projects in the Manteca, Salida, Ripon, Lathrop,
<br />
|