Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.D-21 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2018 Revised Project <br /> (Emission Reduction Credit Banking),or other Actual Emissions Reductions that may be used <br /> to mitigate an emission increase as part of the same Stationary Source Project in accordance <br /> with the provisions of SJVAPCD Rule 2201.Emission offsetting works by using emission <br /> reductions from existing sources to offset emission increases from new or expanding sources. <br /> Emission offsets are considered adequate mitigation because they are enforceable by permit <br /> conditions, legally binding agreements, or other measures, and they are capable of being <br /> monitored and enforced." <br /> To determine whether Project emissions would exceed the NAAQS or CAAQS,emissions were <br /> modeled, added to background concentrations and compared to the standards. Project(future <br /> potential)—Current Actual emissions of CO, NO2 and SO2 would not exceed the NAAQS or <br /> CAAQS when added to background concentrations. Project(future potential)—Current Actual <br /> emissions of PMIo and PM2_5were found to contribute to background concentrations that exceed <br /> the NAAQS and CAAQS (the SJVAPCD is designated nonattainment for PMIo and PM2.5). <br /> Additional information regarding the assumptions and methodologies used in the ambient air <br /> quality analysis is available in the AQIA by SCS Engineers(See Appendix D). <br /> With implementation of Mitigation Measures D.2a. and D.2b., stationary sources would be <br /> mitigated (by D.2a.) and fugitive emissions and mobile emissions would be mitigated (by <br /> D.2b.).The future emission offsets to be purchased as required by Mitigation Measures D.2a. <br /> and D.2b.would reduce emissions in the SJVAB and the Project's contribution to existing <br /> violations of the NAAQS and CAAQS would not be considered substantial after mitigation. <br /> Thus,with mitigation, this impact would be less than significant. <br /> Mitigation Measure D.2a. (Revises 2013 FEIR Mitigation Measure D.2a.): The applicant shall <br /> comply with SJVAPCD Rule 2201 regulations to offset stationary source emissions of VOCs, <br /> CO,NO, SO, PMIo and PM2.5 in excess of the applicable SJVAPCD emissions offset threshold <br /> levels. The applicant shall also comply with Regulation VIII and implement Mitigation <br /> Measure D.1.for operational activities such as earthmoving. <br /> Mitigation Measure D.2b. (Sane-as Revises 2013 FEIR Mitigation Measure D.2b.): Tie <br /> . <br /> ssion knigaets). Thea VERA s, <br /> On-site Particulate Emission AADS Mitigation <br /> The applicant shall implement one or a combination of the following options to reduce air <br /> quality emissions below the thresholds. <br /> (a)Limit future truck trips to an annual average of 233 truck trips per day. Currently the <br /> baseline truck trips are 233 trips per day and the permitted limit is 640 trips per day. <br /> Maintaining the annual average truck trips at 233 trips per day would mean there are no <br /> "increased" PMIo or PM1.5 emissions because of the Project. The proposed Project would <br /> not increase truck traffic at the landfill over the current baseline. <br /> "San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District(SJVAPCD),Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality <br /> Impacts(GAMAQI),March 19,2015. <br />