Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page V-3 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2018 Expansion Project <br /> C. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND REJECTED IN THIS SEIR <br /> An additional alternative, an out-of-coup landfill, was requested to be considered in <br /> out-of-county q <br /> comments on the 2014 Draft SEIR. This alternative was rejected from further <br /> consideration in this SEIR as discussed below. <br /> Out-of-County Alternative <br /> The County does not have jurisdiction to approve any landfill outside of its jurisdiction, <br /> therefore such an alternative would be not be feasible for the lead agency to implement, <br /> ' which is one of CEQA's criteria for considering alternatives (per CEQA Guidelines <br /> Section 15126.6(f)(1). In addition, even though much of the refuse accepted at Forward <br /> comes from outside of the County, given the distribution of Class II landfills in the <br /> 1 region, the Forward facility may be the nearest facility for much of the out-of-county <br /> waste that it accepts. As described in the Project Description, Forward's waste origin for <br /> the period 1995-2017 was as follows:' <br /> ' San Joaquin County 31% <br /> Sacramento County (adjacent) 33% <br /> Stanislaus County (adjacent) 12% <br /> Alameda County (adjacent) 57o <br /> Santa Clara County 4% <br /> ' E1 Dorado County 3510 <br /> All Other Counties Combined 12% <br /> With a relocated, out of county landfill, some wastes would be hauled for shorter <br /> ' distances while other wastes would be hauled farther. Therefore, depending on its <br /> location, an out-of-county alternative may not significantly reduce traffic, noise, or air <br /> quality impacts compared with the proposed project. In addition, establishing a new <br /> ' landfill, with all related construction and operational activities, typically requires more <br /> land and has greater environmental impacts than infilling an existing landfill. <br /> Other Off-Site Alternatives <br /> The 2013 EIR and this SEIR do not consider specific off-site landfill sites (other than the <br /> ' possible expansion of two County landfills) in detail because a new landfill would, by <br /> necessity, require a substantially larger land area and substantially greater ancillary <br /> facilities than would an expansion of an existing landfill. Specifically, a new landfill <br /> would require an operations center, weighing station, truck washing facilities, new <br /> access and internal circulation roads, a new composting facility, new materials sorting <br /> areas, new equipment storage areas, new cover excavation areas, new buffer areas, <br /> possible new utility extensions/expansions, possible traffic control infrastructure, and <br /> other new facilities essential to constructing and operating a landfill that already exist at <br /> existing landfills. <br /> ' ' Sangeeta Lewis,Prinicpal,Lewis Engineering,Letter report to Kevin Basso,General Manager, <br /> Forward,Inc.,Subject:Forward,Inc.Landfill,Infill Development Project;Summary of TonnagelSite <br /> Life/Waste OriginlWaste Type,August 22,2018. <br />