Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page VIII-64 <br /> Forward Inc.Landfill 2018 Expansion Project <br /> Forward has prepared a workplan, which has been submitted to the Water Board, to <br /> evaluate the occurrence of VOCs in the Forward Unit monitoring wells. (Forward Unit <br /> Evaluation, Monitoring, and Interim Corrective Action Work Plan. GLA,June 2018). <br /> Furthermore,to monitor groundwater southeast of the landfill, two additional wells <br /> (MW-25 and MW-26)were constructed on the southeast side of the Forward Unit in ' <br /> December 2018. Water quality would be monitored in these wells quarterly. If there is <br /> evidence of a release, as identified by water quality data in these or other wells <br /> monitoring the Forward Unit,the RWQCB would be notified, and further evaluation of <br /> the nature and extent of the VOCs will be completed, followed by appropriate corrective <br /> measures. <br /> The LaForge wells are located about 3,700 feet southeast of the nearest landfill limits. <br /> This is a substantial distance from the landfill, with no evidence of a release having <br /> occurred to the southeast. Further,the RWQCB has recognized the location of the <br /> LaForge wells relative to the landfill and has not recommended sampling of these or <br /> other agricultural wells, as they are not designed for water quality monitoring and <br /> would not provide representative sample data. New monitoring wells MW-25 and MW- <br /> 26 would detect any releases well in advance of a potential impact to the LaForge well <br /> such that appropriate mitigations as needed, and with the approval of the CVRWQCB, <br /> could be implemented. <br /> J-3. As discussed in the Response to Item J-1A,the groundwater extraction system is <br /> associated with clean-up of the existing legacy plume from the unlined portions of the <br /> Austin Unit. The proposed additional landfill acreage will be lined and the effectiveness <br /> of the lined landfill units is discussed in Response Item J-113. <br /> J-4. The comment states that the SDEIR looks to the preparation of a hydraulic and <br /> drainage study that would culminate in an undefined "project design feature" to control <br /> drainage run-on and runoff. The project design is a performance-based design and <br /> would conform to the 27 CCR 20365 requirement that all waste management"units and <br /> their respective containment be designed and constructed to limit,to the greatest extent <br /> possible,ponding, infiltration, inundation, erosion, slope failure,washout, and <br /> overtopping."Because the Forward Landfill is a Class II facility, the stormwater design <br /> is based on a 1,000-year,24-hr storm as listed in Table 4.1 of the regulation. The <br /> stormwater design is required to be presented in the facility's Joint Technical Document <br /> (JTD)that must be prepared by and stamped by a California Registered Professional <br /> Engineer or Certified Engineering Geologist.The JTD is the permitting document that <br /> will be reviewed and approved by both CalRecycle and the CVRWQCB prior to issuing <br /> operating permits for the facility. A public review period is required by both CalRecycle <br /> and the RWQCB prior to the issuance of operating permits (per 27CCR Division 2, <br /> Subdivision 1,Chapter 4,Subchapter 3). <br /> In addition,Impact G.1 on Page IV.G-17 of the DSEIR states that the"Site run-on and <br /> run-off control facilities consist of drains and perimeter ditches that channel surface <br /> water to holding and evaporation ponds on the site. The surface-water collection drain <br /> system would be designed to divert the water to the onsite sedimentation basins.All <br />