Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page VIII-79 <br /> Forward Inc.Landfill 2018 Expansion Project <br /> water quality. See also responses to comments L-3 and L-4 in the 2013 Final EIR, and <br /> responses to comments J-1 through J-4, above <br /> As discussed in Response J-8,litter as it affects food safety is discussed on pages IV.E-15 <br /> through IV.E-17 of the Draft SEIR. This impact would be less than significant. <br /> J-16. CEQA requires recirculation of a Draft EIR when"significant new information is <br /> added to the EIR.... New information added to an EIR is not"significant" unless the EIR <br /> is changed in a way that deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment <br /> upon a substantial adverse environmental effect or a feasible way to mitigate or avoid <br /> such an effect." (Guidelines Section 154088.5(a)). The Guidelines provide examples of <br /> "significant new information", including a new significant impact, a substantial increase <br /> in the severity of an environmental impact if unmitigated, a feasible alternative or <br /> mitigation measure that differs substantially from those previously analyzed, or changes <br /> to a fundamentally inadequate document to make it adequate. (Guidelines Section <br /> 154088.5(a)).Recirculation is not required where new information added to the EIR <br /> merely clarifies or amplifies, or makes insignificant modifications in an adequate EIR. <br /> As described in the responses to comments in this document,no new significant new <br /> unmitigated impacts have been identified, and,for the impacts that have been identified <br /> in responses, only minor modifications to the mitigation measures have been identified <br /> to assure mitigation. Therefore recirculation of the DSEIR is not required. <br />