Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill Expansion Project MMRP <br /> 90. (H.8)Identified in 2013 EIR(Superseded by Mitigation F.8,above): ' <br /> The Y J +shall Y 1J with the C TA4SGP.nifi a i ation fAs for the o „F. <br /> and field efop lands(SiCOG 2000). Under-the SjN4SGP s <br /> e <br /> eaeb aer-e of Swainhawk habitat(i.e.,Agfietihwal Habitat Lands) eef",efted te non open spaee uses wotfld be <br /> mitigated by the establishment ef 1 aer-e of Row and Field Cfep/Ripar-ian Pfeser-ve(a <br /> 1 <br /> rrEEtiga4ien ratio).- <br /> 91. (H.9)Identified in 2013 EIR: ' <br /> The SJMSCP recommends that within habitat preserves, lighting should be directed <br /> downward and away from preserve areas (through the use of shields)to reduce impacts to <br /> areas occupied by SJMSCP Covered Species(SJCOG 2000). Night lighting with sodium ' <br /> lamps with sharp cutoff angles shall be used to focus light in active landfill areas(target <br /> areas)and to avoid nighttime lighting of adjacent open areas and trees. <br /> 92. (H.10)Identified in This EIR(Superseded by Mitigation F.10,above): ' <br /> biologist appreved by the SJMSP TAC,to detefmine if they r-efleet the most effeetive an <br /> f methods f eepAr-elling ,lofts That biologista ..le <br /> :�t shall o,. ., <br /> �at:,.,,s c.. <br /> �efnefA if needed-. <br /> 93.Austin 1994(F2.a) (similar),Austin 2000(F2.a) ' <br /> Under current project plans, 31 of the 32 valley oaks are along the perimeter of the site or <br /> are in the designated wildlife preserve adjacent to the creek and would not be removed. <br /> 94.Austin 1994(F2.b) (similar),Austin 2000(F2.b) ' <br /> Prior to initiation of any activity within a 100 foot radius of a valley oak proposed for <br /> retention, the project proponent shall install clearly visible temporary fencing around the ' <br /> dripline of the Valley oak to prevent inadvertent damage during on-site activities. Fencing <br /> shall be removed upon completion of activity within the oak's vicinity. Site workers shall be <br /> advised of the sensitivity of on-site oaks to disturbance. <br /> 95.Austin 1994(F2.c) (similar),Austin 2000(F2.c) <br /> Where avoidance of a valley oak(s) as specified above is determined infeasible, the project <br /> proponent shall replace each oak as required by the County's Natural Resources ' <br /> Regulations: three oaks shall be planted in appropriate locations for each oak removed. <br /> Replacement trees shall be the same species as the removed trees. Replacement trees shall <br /> be planted on the site in association with the Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan <br /> described above. ' <br /> 96.Austin 1994(F2.d) (similar),Austin 2000(F2.d) <br /> To ensure the success of mitigation,planted and retained trees shall be monitored for a ' <br /> period of five years following initial disturbance within the vicinity of a retained tree or <br /> following planting of a replacement tree. If, during the course of monitoring, a significant <br /> decline in the health ofplanted or retained trees is identified by a qualified arborist, the tree ' <br /> shall be replaced as described above. <br /> 97.Austin 2000(F14.a) <br /> Pre-construction surveys for greater western mastiff bat should be conducted prior to <br /> removing any trees from the project site. These pre-construction surveys maybe required <br /> and funded by the SJMSCP JPA and should be conducted by a biologist with experience <br /> Page 38 <br />