Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.0-11 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2018 Expansion Project <br /> Impact CA. Cumulative Traffic Noise Impacts (Revises 2013 EIR Impact C.4.) <br /> In the 2013 EIR, traffic noise levels were modeled for two cumulative scenarios,including a near-term <br /> scenario that considers projects in the study area and the 2035 scenario, which is based on the findings <br /> of the study of the proposed Mariposa Lakes development. The cumulative noise analysis in the 2013 <br /> EIR found that the near-term and 2035 noise level increases attributed to increased traffic from other <br /> planned development and the increased project truck traffic would exceed the significance criteria along <br /> roadway segments on Austin Road,Arch Road and French Camp west of Austin Road. <br /> Cumulative traffic noise level increases for the revised project are shown in Table IV.0-4(columns <br /> identified as"Change Existing+Project+Cumulative from Existing"; "Change 2036 Cumulative NP from <br /> Existing NP";and"Change 2036+Project from Existing NP"). The table shows that the noise levels <br /> would increase in 2036 (compared to the existing levels)before addition of the noise from the increased <br /> project truck traffic. The additional truck traffic noise that would be associated with the proposed <br /> project would further increase traffic noise and contribute to a significant cumulative noise impact. <br /> As stated in the 2013 EIR Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures Table, no feasible mitigation <br /> measures are available to reduce the projects contribution to cumulative noise impacts. It should be <br /> noted that sound barriers are not feasible in the semi-rural areas that would be affected by cumulative <br /> traffic increases,because the barriers would be far removed from the activity areas of sensitive <br /> receptors and the sound barriers would generally be an unnatural barrier not only to noise but also to <br /> distant views now possible in these areas. Thus,no mitigations are available for this cumulative <br /> impact other than reducing project operations. Such a reduction would be a substantial change to the <br /> proposed project and therefore is addressed as a component of Alternative 2B (Reduced Size/Reduced <br /> Daily Operations Alternative)in Chapter V of the 2013 EIR. Therefore,the project's noise increment is <br /> considered to be cumulatively considerable and the cumulative traffic noise impact is considered <br /> significant and unavoidable. <br />