Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.D-30 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2018 Revised Project <br /> The purchase of the verifiable GHG credits22 would reduce the impact to a level that is less than <br /> significant. <br /> Impact D.5.The project would contribute to a cumulative air quality impact in the project <br /> area (Revises 2013 EIR Impact 13.6.). <br /> According to the SJVAPCD GAMAQI, cumulative impacts should be assessed for ozone,PM10, <br /> CO, and TAC. The SJVAB is nonattainment for both the NAAQS and CAAQS for ozone. The <br /> SJVAB is nonattainment for the CAAQS for PM10.The nonattainment status of ozone and PM10 <br /> in the SJVAB is a result of past and present development within the SJVAB. Thus,the existing <br /> emissions of ozone and PM10 in the SJVAB have resulted in an existing significant cumulative <br /> impact. <br /> Ozone impacts are the result of the cumulative emissions from numerous sources in the region <br /> and transport from outside the region. Ozone impacts are assessed based on the emissions of <br /> NO,, and VOC (ozone precursors). The project would have a less than significant impact on <br /> project-level ozone impacts (after mitigation). However, the residual emissions from the project <br /> (emissions after mitigation and emissions from the extended years of landfill operations, and <br /> increased daily acceptance rate [above existing actual emissions], as a result of the project) <br /> would contribute to overall ozone nonattainment in the region and would be considered a <br /> cumulatively considerable contribution to the existing significant cumulative impact in the <br /> SJVAB. <br /> PM10 impacts are assessed by determining exposure to sensitive receptors near the project site <br /> from earth disturbing activities from the current project and any nearby projects that may occur <br /> at the same time. According to SJVAPCD GAMAQI, if the level of earth disturbing activity may <br /> cause an adverse impact, enhanced dust control measures should be included to reduce the <br /> impact to less than significant levels. Thus, with Mitigation Measure D.2a. and D.2b., the <br /> project-level impacts of PM10 from the project would be less than significant. However,the <br /> project would contribute to the overall PMIo nonattainment within the region. Because the <br /> project would result in PM10 emissions from traffic and operations every day (due to the <br /> extended years of landfill operations as a result of the project), the project's emissions would be <br /> considered a cumulatively considerable contribution to the existing significant cumulative <br /> impact in the SJVAB. <br /> In recent years, CO measurements are well below AAQS due to the retirement of older <br /> polluting vehicles, less emissions from new vehicles, and improvements in fuels. As a result,no <br /> future violations of the CO standard are anticipated from the project and any cumulative <br /> project in the vicinity. The cumulative CO impact would be less than significant. <br /> TAC emissions were found to be well below the SJVAPCD thresholds for incremental cancer <br /> risk and non-carcinogenic acute and chronic risks (see Section IV.E.,Public Health and Safety, <br /> 22 A carbon credit or carbon offset is a credit for GHG emissions reduced or removed from the atmosphere from an <br /> emissions reduction project,which can be used,by governments,industry or private individuals to compensate for <br /> the emissions they are generating.California's long-term GHG reductions goals in existing laws/regulations such as <br /> E.O.S-3-05,E.O.B-30-15,and S.B.32 ensure carbon credits will be available in 2020 and beyond. <br />