Laserfiche WebLink
J&A Solari, Inc. Page 9 of 11 <br /> Our Project Number: NA157007 <br /> February 20, 2015 <br /> • Surrounding properties have been used for agriculture in the past; agricultural chemicals <br /> may have been applied to these properties. <br /> 3.5 Current Off-Site Sources of Contamination <br /> No above- or below-ground off-site potential or known sources of contamination were identified <br /> from current uses of the surrounding properties, except for the following: <br /> • Surrounding properties are used for agriculture; agricultural chemicals may be applied to <br /> these properties. <br /> 4.0 EVALUATION OF IDENTIFIED CONTAMINATION SOURCES <br /> Agricultural chemical residues containing chlorpyrifos may remain on the property. This <br /> chemical has been identified as toxic to birds and aquatic organisms. No evidence was found <br /> however, to indicate that the chemicals were applied inappropriately. <br /> Underground infrastructure may exist on the subject property in the vicinity of the former <br /> structures. <br /> If water wells are not properly operated and maintained, they can serve as contamination <br /> conduits to groundwater. Septic systems may be used for inappropriate disposal of hazardous <br /> substances. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Given the historical uses of agricultural chemicals on the subject property, meaningful <br /> conclusions regarding the presence or extent of such material cannot be determined without <br /> soil sampling and analysis. Such sampling and analysis is especially warranted in the <br /> conversion of agricultural land into residential use. <br /> Should future residents of the subject property be interested in determining the quality of their <br /> drinking water, EHD should be contacted for direction regarding the potential for impacts to <br /> groundwater from the agricultural history of the property and vicinity. <br /> The oil staining around the agricultural well head at the northern property boundary should be <br /> cleaned up, and a well service should be consulted to address possible maintenance issues at <br /> both wells on the property. <br /> Because no staining was observed in the vicinity of the transformers, the transformers are not <br /> considered an environmental threat to the subject property at this time. Should the property <br /> owners or the EHD be concerned about PCB contamination from the transformers, PG&E should <br /> be contacted to test, retrofit, or replace the transformers. <br /> Any wells or septic systems identified which will not remain in use should be abandoned under <br /> EHD oversight. <br /> ,.,44 <br /> ©2015 Neil O.Anderson&Associates,Inc. <br /> A Terracon Company <br />