My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0003875 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BANTA
>
28200
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0400091
>
SU0003875 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:30:12 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:17:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0003875
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0400091
STREET_NUMBER
28200
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
BANTA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/11/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
28200 S BANTA RD
RECEIVED_DATE
3/10/2004 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\B\BANTA\28200\PA-0400091\SU0003875\SS STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
T <br /> F1 February 16, 2005 <br /> NOA Project Number: E040148A <br /> 6.7 Discussion of Percolation Test Results <br /> The soils within the sewage disposal areas of the proposed Parcels 1 and 2 have demonstrated a <br /> satisfactory percolation rate in accordance with the requirements of the EHD. The soils of these <br /> parcels appear to be suitable for a septic system utilizing shallow leach lines or a filter bed. <br /> 6.8 Discussion of Septic System Sizing <br /> Septic s Y stem construction should follow the San Joaquin County On-Site Vastewater Disposal <br /> Standards where applicable. <br /> 7.0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> In summary, satisfactory percolation rates of the soil were achieved in the proposed septic disposal <br /> areas of the two parcels. The proposed Parcels 1 and 2 appear suitable for a standard septic system. <br /> E, No ground water was encountered in any of the borings drilled on the property. No well was <br /> available to take a water sample for the property. <br /> F1 8.0 LIMITATIONS <br /> The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the existing and <br /> F1 proposed development, the use of the subject property, and the site conditions as they existed at the <br /> time we excavated our test holes and performed the percolation tests. It was.assumed that the test <br /> holes and percolation test results are representative of the subsurface conditions in the general area. <br /> Out professional services were performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions proposed in <br /> F ' accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of <br /> all other warranties either expressed or implied. Test findings and statements of professional <br /> V1opinion do not constitute a guarantee or warranty,expressed or implied. -= <br /> NEIL O.ANDERSON&ASSOC., INC. P�� GAO Q <br /> pF1 W No. 2151 'Y 1 <br /> EI�GIN�E�i�,PlG <br /> GEOLOGIST <br /> David Welch,M. c. � z <br /> Rebecca Haskett, B.S. J <br /> Project Manager CEG-2151, CHG-653, GP-1049 <br /> F! Environmental Division Manager <br /> P <br /> F1 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.