Laserfiche WebLink
r7ocompare this theoretical maximum concentration of 62 ppm NO3 with previous studies, data <br /> from theCastello/Linne Estates Nitrate Loading Study of water from the Maurland Manor well <br /> was reviewed. This well water analysis was found to be 60 ppm NO3. It was theorized that the <br /> nitrate concentration determined from the Maurland well was due to the following scenario: This <br /> well had not been operational for several months prior to being turned on to adequately purge the <br /> casing before sampling. At the time the well was shut off for excessive nitrate, the nitrate . <br /> concentration was 45 ppm in June 1998. When the sample was retrieved in September 1999, the <br /> nitrate level had increased to 60 ppm. The well log indicates perforations from 89 ft to 214 ft. It <br /> is theorized that nitrate "settled" on the top aquifer with the only influence on this concentration <br /> being an additional influx of nitrate, fluctuations in groundwater elevation, and the velocity of <br /> the groundwater flow. When the well was turned on, the cone of depression(drawdown curve) <br /> pulled in the accumulated nitrate into the well. It is theorized that since the Cole well has less <br /> upgrad.ient septic system influence than the Maurland well,the water table nitrate could be at a <br /> f lower concentration. <br /> It can be hypothesized that the observed nitrate concentrations within "Valpico Section" are <br /> coming into equilibrium. Sources contributing nitrate to the underlying groundwater include <br /> indigenous soil concentrations from decomposing organic matter, rainfall, upgradient agricultural <br /> fertilizer inputs, septic systems (particularly sumps and pits), and lawn/landscape fertilization. <br /> Factors decreasing the groundwater nitrate concentration include denitrification, groundwater <br /> movement (both vertical and horizontal), well pumping and hydraulics, and cleaner water <br /> recharge contributing to a dilution effect. Therefore, if each of these sources and attenuating <br /> factors could be quantified on a mass balance basis, it may be that nitrate input is now roughly <br /> equivalent to output, or attenuation. Given that agricultural irrigation recharge is the largest <br /> single contributor to groundwater nitrate concentrations based on my own observations, and <br /> since the surrounding land has been farmed for several decades, it is assumed that the nitrate <br /> concentrations in the underlying groundwater should be much higher than those observed, if the <br /> attenuating factors were not significant. This is what was observed with the soil chemical <br /> analyses. The nitrate concentration within the soil environment under the Cole's leachline <br /> revealed decreasing nitrate-nitrogen concentrations with depth, presumably due to denitrification. <br /> The denitrification potential is significant due to the comparatively high clay content of the <br /> indigenous soils, the higher soil pH, high soil moisture content and organic fraction content. <br /> NITRATE-NITROGEN IMPACT MITIGATION <br /> Given that the indigenous soils under the subject property are conducive for denitrification, the <br /> septic system for the new Cole residence on Parcel 1 should be installed to take advantage of <br /> these favorable soil characteristics. This can be accomplished by installing a dual septic system <br /> per San Joaquin County Sewage Standards Section 10.1 which states: "Estate type zoning (R=R) <br /> shall require a double leach field system with an alternating distribution box to be'installed at the <br /> time of construction."j <br /> It is proposed to install two separate leachfields: north of the new house and south of the new <br /> house. The south facing leachf eld will take advantage of the increased "drying effect" during <br /> the drier months of April through October. Leachline trenches should be installed as high in <br /> Page -8- <br /> VlaCfey Ag Research <br />