Laserfiche WebLink
Geo6ytaf7erhnics Inc. Page <br /> Sod Groundwater Investigation Report ` <br /> C&B Equipment <br /> Project No.: 336..2 <br /> December 22, 1997 <br /> grout (augmented with <4% bentonite) via a tremie tube. The well was secured with a <br /> locking watertight cap encased in flush mounted traffic rated well box. <br /> On October 20, 1997,Don Light of Del Tech mobilized to the site to developed the new <br /> monitoring wells (using mechanical surging and pumping methods) until a clear stream of <br /> water was obtained. On October 23, 1997, Don Light returned to the site to purge and collect <br /> groundwater samples from the three existing monitoring wells on site, the five new <br /> monitoring wells and one domestic well associated with the site. All development and purge <br /> water was containerized in 55 gallon DOT approved containers and stored on site until its <br /> disposition could be arranged. The groundwater monitoring logs are included in Appendix <br /> D. <br /> The top of casing elevations for the monitoring wells were surveyed in by Duane Kimball, <br /> licensed land surveyor, on December 16, 1997. The elevations are referenced to the U.S.G.S. <br /> bench mark"Tracy AZ". A site map with his elevations is included in Appendix E. <br /> `= 2.2.1 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> The groundwater in the new well was sampled no sooner than 24 hours after well <br /> development. The following was the procedure for the sampling of groundwater from the <br /> +. well: <br /> Before sampling was attempted the well was sounded for depth to water. The wells were <br /> then purged of at least 3 well volumes of stagnant water using a submersible pump. Purging <br /> continued until the temperature, conductivity, and <br /> e H of the groundwater has stabilized <br /> p <br /> (<10% variation between three readings) indicating that formation water representative of <br /> aquifer conditions was entering the well. These water quality parameters were measured at <br /> intervals of each well volume purged. <br /> A stainless steel bailer was used to collect each sample. Care was taken to minimize sample <br /> agitation from the initial filling of the bailer to the transfer of the sample to the VOA vial and <br /> glass amber liter bottles. Once the sample container was filled and capped, the bottle was <br /> _ then inverted, tapped, and checked for head space bubbles. The sample container was then <br /> identified and labeled with a unique designation, inserted into foam holders and placed in an <br /> ice chest cooled to VC for transport to the laboratory. <br /> All non disposable sampling equipment was decontaminated using a steam cleaner before <br /> <i and between uses. The effectiveness of the decontamination procedure is ensured by using <br /> the following quality control measures: <br /> • Disposable gloves were used by the technician to collect all samples and were changed <br /> with each sampling event. <br /> • A bailer blank for the well was collected prior to sampling by filling the decontaminated <br /> - stainless steel bailer with water (provided by the laboratory) and then filling a VOA vial <br /> (provided by the laboratory) using the same procedures for actual sample collection. <br /> Bailer blanks for each sample, along with a field blank (prepared from water provided by the <br /> laboratory poured into a VOA vial on site), accompanied the samples to the laboratory and <br /> serve as checks against cross contamination. <br /> l .-i <br /> i <br /> 'i <br />