Laserfiche WebLink
MCLEOD PROPERTY <br /> Page No. 3 <br /> of nitrates was well below the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) <br /> allowed by law. <br /> VI. SOIL PROFILE AND PERCOLATION TESTS <br /> Two, 10 foot deep test holes were excavated by hand in the <br /> area of the existing and proposed homesite in order to determine <br /> the soil profiles in the general area. For approximate location of <br /> the test holes (PT) see the Parcel Map in the Appendix. The tests <br /> holes were logged by a civil engineer and a description of the <br /> soils encountered in each test hole is contained in the Appendix. <br /> The soils varied slightly between the two sites. The shallow <br /> percolating stratum at the existing homesite is a sandy silt and <br /> the shallow percolating stratum at the proposed homesite on the <br /> Designated Remainder property is a sandy clayey silt. The clay <br /> content at the second test location is reflected in a slower <br /> percolation rate. <br /> Two 36 inch deep by 8 inch diameter test hole were excavated <br /> by hand adjacent to the soil profile holes for performing shallow <br /> percolation tests. Two inches of gravel was placed in the bottom <br /> of each hole. A 3 inch diameter perforated pipe was then placed in. <br /> each hole and backfilled with gravel. Both holes were filled with <br /> water 24 hours prior to running the tests. The last half hour of <br /> the tests readings were witnessed by a county health official and <br /> the test data obtained is enclosed in the appendix. The <br /> percolation rates have been adjusted to account for the gravel and <br /> pipe backfill . Calculations for adjustments are on the test data <br /> sheets. <br /> A summary of the test results is presented next: <br /> Diameter of Depth of <br /> Test No. Hole (in. ) Hole (in. ) Percolation Rate min in <br /> PT-1 8 36 3 . 3 <br /> PT-2 8 36 11.5 <br /> VII CONCLUSION <br /> Based on the results of the shallow percolation tests, the <br /> soil profile, and the performance of the septic systems in the <br /> surrounding area, it is our opinion that both the existing and <br /> proposed homesites resulting from the proposed parcel split should <br /> IDERSG <br /> N <br /> P <br /> so G� <br />