Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 8 <br /> E <br /> The only other constituents to exceed MCLs were iron and manganese in the Koster well (only <br /> i <br /> once), South Tracy 91 well (only twice), and the two Brown's wells. It is important to note that I <br /> l <br /> none of these four wells is a domestic well; the Koster well is used for irrigation and the South i <br /> Tracy #1 and Brown's wells are for industrial uses. The analytical results from these wells 'I <br /> indicated that iron and manganese concentrations were typically below detection limits and were <br /> E <br /> intermittently at or above the respective MCLS possibly due to higher turbidity in those samples. <br /> In the case of the Brown's wells, samples have exceeded the MCLs for iron and manganese more <br /> i <br /> often than other wells, and this has continued to be the case during 1997. The Brown's #1 well <br /> is a standby well that is used very infrequently and it would be expected that samples from this <br /> iwell be more turbid, despite the ample amount of purging that has been performed prior to <br /> sampling the well (upwards of 10 casing volumes). The Brown's New well has been used less <br /> frequently during 1997 due to operational problems and has shown similar elevated iron and <br /> manganese concentrations during that time. Support for the assumption that the elevated iron and <br /> manganese concentrations are derived from fine sediment in turbid samples is provided by field <br /> observations during sample collection. During the periods when iron and manganese I <br /> i <br /> concentrations were elevated, the sample was observed to be turbid; alternately, during the <br /> periods when these constituents were very low or non-detectable, the well was or had been <br /> pumping already and sample turbidity was very low. <br /> Total coliform bacteria were absent from the domestic wells during 1994 through early 1998 with <br /> the exception of the Faulkner well during the fall of 1994. Samples collected in October and <br /> from retesting in November of that year showed coliform bacteria were present, but none were <br /> fecal coliform. All testing subsequent to treating (disinfecting) the well indicated the coliform <br /> bacteria have been absent since January 1995. <br />+ i <br /> ® LL1F--SDORFF� 5 SCALMANINI <br /> C GN! 5 Li L r I C1 E nl G 1 11 E E P ,-3 <br /> V <br />