My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012813
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BIRD
>
37400
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
EIR-96-02
>
SU0012813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2020 10:34:08 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:29:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012813
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
EIR-96-02
STREET_NUMBER
37400
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
BIRD
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95304-
APN
2651206
ENTERED_DATE
1/8/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
37400 S BIRD RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\B\BIRD\37400\EIR-96-02\EIR.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i; <br /> 20 <br /> for. making stone tools. Suitable cobbles were collected and used <br /> as ready-made milling implements, or were broken up to provide <br /> pieces of sharp stone to be made into flaked stone tools. <br /> It is to be appreciated that local availability of numerous <br /> types of resources, many of which no longer exist (an example <br /> being a watercourse which is now dry or occupies a different <br /> channel) , might have induced the Native Americans to inhabit or <br /> visit localities that today appear uninviting. <br /> In summary, prefield background research indicates that <br /> while the project area could not be identified as an area of <br /> [ , unusual significance from the point of view of the Native <br /> American residents of the Central Valley, it was an integral part <br /> of the larger San Joaquin River resource exploitation zone, and <br /> could have been visited or occupied seasonally or occasionally by <br /> the Yokuts, or by their neighbors the Miwok (Kroeber 1925: 444 <br /> ff. ) . Prefield research indicated that no historical sites, <br /> ranches, or other cultural features are known to be located on <br /> the project area. <br /> 3: RESEARCH' DESIGN <br /> Introduction <br /> Research designs in cultural resources investigations and <br /> management invoke formal, systematic procedures to direct and <br /> guide the execution of archaeological investigations.The process <br /> of archaeological research is controlled and guided by the <br /> research design to integrate theory, method, data and <br /> interpretation (Binford 1964:425-441; Brim and Spain 1974; Fowler <br /> 1982 : 1-50; Watson et al. 1971) . The key elements of research <br /> designs for archaeological survey projects integrate numerous <br /> theoretical and methodological considerations, guide the proposed <br /> research and organize the operations undertaken to conduct the <br /> research. The principal theoretical orientation to field <br /> research conducted in respect to the present proposed project is <br /> the concept of project-specific systematic archaeological survey,. <br /> as discussed by Dancey (1981:83-126) , Hester et al. (1975) , King <br /> (1978) , Napton (1981) , and Thomas (1989) . <br /> Research objectives <br /> The principal objectives of cultural resources survey of <br />` theJ <br /> ro <br /> ro osed project area were to: (1) ascertain whether <br /> P P P <br /> archaeological or historical cultural resources occur on the <br /> proposed project area; (2) locate and record the cultural <br /> resources; (3) assess the potential significance of the cultural <br /> ( <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.