My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012813
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BIRD
>
37400
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
EIR-96-02
>
SU0012813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2020 10:34:08 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:29:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012813
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
EIR-96-02
STREET_NUMBER
37400
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
BIRD
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95304-
APN
2651206
ENTERED_DATE
1/8/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
37400 S BIRD RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\B\BIRD\37400\EIR-96-02\EIR.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E <br /> 28 <br /> formally recorded on or near the proposed project area.- At the <br /> present time many parts of California have been subject to <br /> cultural resources investigations, but large areas remain to be <br /> examined. For this reason, the absence of recorded cultural <br /> resources in the files of the California Historical Resources <br /> Information System pertaining to a given area does not of itself <br /> constitute cultural resources clearance for a proposed project. <br /> The third method of investigation of the proposed�. . g p p project <br /> was to conduct direct field inspection of the project area in <br /> order to locate, identify and record cultural resources and to <br /> assess the potential scientific significance or importance of an <br /> g P Y <br /> cultural resources revealed by direct field inspection or other <br /> methods. <br /> The results of cultural resources investigations of the : <br /> proposed project area, obtained pursuant to application of the <br /> first and second investigative methods, are presented in specific <br /> sections of this report. The results of the third method (direct <br /> field inspection) are given in the following section. <br /> Direct Field Inspection <br /> The proposed project area was examined by a cultural <br /> ' resources investigations team led by the writer. The proposed <br /> project, a gravel extraction area, covers approximately 500 <br /> acres, and consists of a northeast segment exhibiting an almond <br /> orchard and contemporary gravel plant, and a southwest segment <br /> that contains the remains of a former gravel extraction area, now <br /> a livestockP asture. <br /> Survey Procedure <br /> The CSUS/IAR cultural resources inspection team drove to the <br /> proposed project area via Bird Road, which provides access to <br /> E both project segments. The area was initially inspected by <br />` driving along the farm roads flanking the edges of the project <br /> area, in order to become familiar with terrain, points of access, <br /> and landmarks. Having completed initial orientation, the survey <br /> team inspected the northeast area by conducting a series of <br /> transects configured to provide general coverage of the segment, <br /> which has been subject to previous cultural resources <br /> E investigations (Canaday et al. 1992 ; Maniery 1985; Moratto et al. <br /> 1990) . Since the tract is leveled to agricultural grade, it was <br /> cost-effective and efficient to examine it by means of a <br /> systematic series of parallel transects oriented west to east, <br /> originating at the northeast corner of the project area on Bird <br /> Road and proceeding back and forth between the rows of almond <br /> trees. The survey team inspected the project area . walking in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.