Laserfiche WebLink
� r <br /> drainage has two major tributaries when, taken together, makes it <br /> the longest of all four creek systems. In addition to these. <br /> length differences, the two long canyons are also considerably: <br /> wider than the shorter ones, especially in their terminal areas; <br /> west of I-580. Finally, the long canyons have many side canyon <br /> tributaries , many of which pass though relatively low hill;,. <br /> systems. In contrast, the Hospital Creek canyon has only a few, <br /> short, steep side canyons. Indeed, the distal third of this.: <br /> drainage is a steep-walled ravine. <br /> When applying these contrasting terrain features to SJKF <br /> distribution, one must recall that this canine evolved as a semi- . <br /> desert species which once ranged over great expanses of _flat, <br /> salt bush scrub habitat in the pristine San Joaquin Valley. With <br /> the advent of irrigation and urbanization during this century, <br /> its only remaining habitat segments are the canyon floors and; <br /> ° east lowland fringes of the Innercoast Range west of I-580 and I <br /> 5. A tabulation by Bell, 1994, of SJKF sightings for the past <br /> three decades clearly shows this present marked separation of <br /> SJKF arid grassland habitat and the irrigated cropland of San: <br /> Joaquin County (Figure 14) . <br /> However, the recent studies of these four Innercoast Range <br /> drainages in western San Joaquin County show that the current <br /> habitat preference of the SJKF for canyon floor sites is not. <br /> universal. Indeed, it now appears that only those creek drainage., <br /> ' systems with comparatively broad canyon floors and long courses <br /> with extensive side canyons which permit lowland movement through <br /> segments of the Innercoast Range provide suitable permanent <br /> habitat for this canine. Conversely, smaller drainages which do <br /> not possess these features appear to be ignored by kit fox. In <br /> addition, the intense grazing pressure and past soil surface: <br /> disruption in the lower Hospital Creek drainage may make this; <br /> particular small canyon even less appealing as a SJKF habitat. <br /> One further finding common to all four of the I-580/1-5 junction. <br /> studies is that no record of any kind of SJKF presence east of 1- <br /> 580 was obtained. This is especially interesting since the I-580 : <br /> bridge overpasses for both Lone Tree and Hospital Creeks appear <br /> to afford safe and relatively secluded passage to the irrigated" <br /> orchard and cropland to the east. The fact that this semi-desert <br /> adapted species has not been found in this latter area supports. <br /> the sound ecological reasoning that this is simply not <br /> appropriate habitat for the SJKF. <br /> Given the convincing negative survey results for studies east of <br /> I-580 and equally strong evidence for the fact that the <br /> agricultural lands here do not conform to the scientifically <br /> based habitat description for this species, only one question <br /> remains: Does a SJKF ever venture under the I-580 overpasses to <br /> sites east of this highway? The best answer here, I believe, yes <br /> once in a great while. This idea is based on several past: <br /> records of male SJKFs wandering far beyond their average home] <br /> range estimate of 1.7 square miles (Zoellick, et al, 1987) . <br /> These were most likely cases of displacement of young males from <br /> an established adult male's territory, and as such must be <br /> considered a small part of this species' overall life history. <br /> 11 <br />