Laserfiche WebLink
{ April I3,2000... is <br /> Job,. lumber:LG00-114} <br /> Page S rt. <br /> -.-Table;,Results and Variables Used in the Mass"Balance Analysis <br /> (see worksheets in Appendix for calculations) _ <br /> J: <br /> Result of Denitrifi= Deep Rain Waste,level 4 Rain Acres f' <br />�s Analysis . cat on 5 Percolation` Concentration 5 <br /> -� 0.94 m -N 25% 4 7.86 inches 45 mo N- 0.17 m N 25' „ <br /> The result of.the nitrate-loading analysis indicates that viewing the combined septic load of <br /> 343allons per da <br /> g p y(average) effluent at.a concentration of 45.0 mg/l N and-7.96 inches of rain at. ' <br /> A concentration of 017-mg/l N'for the 25 acre site for an'average year,the total combined <br /> a. <br /> $' concentration of mtrates.from these two sources before mixing with-ground-water is estimated to <br /> be 0.94 mg/1-N usingma typical denitrificaiton factor of 25%. This concentration is about 9% of <br /> the maximum contamtnate,level (MCL)for the.drinking water standard of 10 in N. <br /> VIII: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> In conclusion 4he percolation test indicated.the onsite,soils percolafe 0.31 minutes per. <br /> inch at a depth'of 15'feet The septic.peimit review..has shown that'generally septic systems with <br />�. -leach lines and seepage,pits were used in.the area- .The three (3) eN,ploratory borings did not, <br /> encounter.ground water however a localized,moist zone was encountered in 9-1 between the <br /> depths..of 10.5 to 11 feet., 'Recent County ground--water depth-maps have shown the depth to k <br /> ` ` .ground water.ranged;between approximately 100 feet to 120 feet in 1998-at,the subject site. . <br /> The estimated total average yearly nitrate loading-concentration for the property is estimated to f <br /> be 0.94 mg/1-N, about 9% of the maximum contaminate level for the,di nking water. This k <br /> represents the-combined concentration.of percolating effluent and percolating -ainwater:before !' <br /> nixing with ground water. <br /> Based ori the "results of this study,we believe-the site is suitable fora new septic system <br /> ` and the'propased'project will not negativelyimpact ground water quality.,Provided-our - <br /> recommendations are:followed,we do.not believe-that the initial phase or future phase of.the <br /> proposed project will:lnegatively impact"ground water quality.,The recommendations for the septic <br /> system are as follows <br /> s Hantzshe N.N.,.Finnemore,E.J. 1991,Predicating Ground Water Nitrate-Nitrogen Impacts. Ground <br /> Water Vol.30,No.4. ; <br />