Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Item No. 1 <br /> PC: 11-5-92 <br /> SU-91-15 <br /> Page 1 <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> It is recommended that the Planning Commission: <br /> 1. Certify as adequate Final Environmental Impact Report No. ER-90-3 under the provisions of <br /> Section 15090 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). <br /> 2. Recommend to the Board of Supervisors approval of a Resolution Repealing the Specific <br /> Road Plan for Sharon Drive from Jack Tone Road to Tully Road (Attachment A). <br /> 3. Approve Major Subdivision Application No.SU-91-15 (Tract No.2493) based on the Findings <br /> and Subject to the Conditions of Approval recommended In the staff report and subject to <br /> approval by the Board of Supervisors'of a Resolution to Abandon the Specific Road Plan for <br /> Sharon Drive from Jack Tone Road to Tully Road and approval of Zone Reclassification <br /> Application No.ZR-92.13. The Major Subdivision application shall be effective 30 days after <br /> approval of the Zone Reclassification. <br /> FINDINGS <br /> } 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent the General Plan,any applicable Specific Plan and Special <br /> Purpose Plan, and any other applicable plan adopted by the County. <br /> • This Finding can be made because the proposed subdivision is consistent with the <br /> Residential and Growth Accommodation Policies of the 2010 General Plan,as well as <br /> the Low Density Residential designation on the General Plan Map. Abandonment of <br /> the Specific Road Plan for Sharon Drive by the Board of Supervisors will not result <br /> with Inconsistencies with the General Plan's Transportation Policies because access <br /> between Tully Road and Jack Tone Road will be provided by Sparrow Hawk Drive, <br /> through the Tessie Estates Subdivision, and Lambert Way, through this subdivision. <br /> 2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and <br /> any applicable speck plans or Special Purpose Plan. <br /> • This Finding can be made because the size and number of lots proposed are within <br /> the density range (2.5 dwelling units per gross acre) allowed under the General Plan <br /> designation of Low Density Residential and because adequate traffic circulation will <br /> be provided by the design of the subdivisions's streets. <br /> 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. <br /> y This Finding can be made because each lot In the subdivision Is large enough to <br /> accommodate the proposed single-family residential development with public water, <br /> public sewage disposal, and public drainage system. <br /> • <br />