Laserfiche WebLink
CAP Addendum:Former FuJQ Station, 7500 West Eleventh Street, Tracy, Page 3 <br /> Eleventh Street. The revised distance is 80 ft. Based on the above assumptions, it is <br /> estimated that the area of the subsurface beneath the Navarra Site that is currently <br /> affected by LNAPL is not greater than 9,200 fl2. �^cur_4 �i^v lS � <br /> 2.t.4 Total Volume of LNAPL in Subsurface <br /> Taking the porosity of the soil in the formation to be 0.3 (The San Joaquin Company Inc. <br /> 2002), the actual thickness of floating product to be 0.05 ft. (Section 2.1.1), and the areal <br /> extent of floating product to be 9,200 ftZ (Section 2.1.3) yields an estimated total volume <br /> of LNAPL of 138 ft3, or 1,050 gallons. - ,,f acrw w/rc 'Orr: „?Oz c - <br /> 2.1.5 Recoverable FloatinzProduct <br /> Due to adsorption of liquid-phase hydrocarbons onto soil particles, a significant portion <br /> of LNAPL present in a zone just above and below the water table does not flow freely out <br /> of the soil when the water table falls, nor when clean water flows into the soil pores from <br /> up-gradient locations. Thus, the volume of LNAPL that can actually be extracted from <br /> the in situ soil by any given remediation technology (other than removal by excavation) is <br /> frequently considerably less than the total volume of non-aqueous phase hydrocarbons <br /> present in the soil mass. <br /> The relationships between the apparent thickness of floating product measured in a well, <br /> the actual thickness in the adjacent formations, and the amount of product that is <br /> recoverable are complex and are affected by. soil-specific and LNAPL-specific <br /> parameters and the dynamics of the hydrogeologic regime prevailing at any given <br /> moment. As was also explained in the CAP, various methods have been developed to <br /> make approximate estimates of the volume of recoverable LNAPL in an aquifer. <br /> However, application of different methods results in a very wide range of estimated <br /> recoverable volumes for the same in situ conditions. For example, curves of the <br /> relationship between the volume of LNAPL in porous media for any given depth of <br /> LNAPL in a well have been developed from numerical analytical models. Among the <br /> most conservative of the methods is that developed by Farr, Houghtalen and McWhorter <br /> (1990). However, when the thickness of the LNAPL in the well is as low as 0.05 ft., that <br /> methodology predicts zero recoverable LNAPL. Alternately, a very conservative estimate <br /> of the recoverable volume of LNAPL can be made using the procedure developed by <br /> Testa and Paczkowski (1989). Their method employs a single parameter that is dependent <br /> upon soil type to estimate the volume of recoverable product from a unit volume of <br /> affected soil. They estimated the oil retention capacity of soil to range from 5 Uma (0.34 <br /> gal/ft) for gravel to 40 L/m3 (2.96 gal/ft) for silty sand. Adopting the value for silty <br /> sand, it is estimated that the volume of recoverable free product in the subsurface under <br /> the 7500 W. Eleventh Street Site would be 2.96 gallons of floating product per cubic foot <br /> of affected soil. `"~- <br /> 2.1.6 Order of Magnitude Estimate of Volume of LNAPL to be Recovered <br /> As was described in Section 2.1.3, the estimated area of the subsurface affected by <br />