Laserfiche WebLink
7-73 <br /> If implemented <br /> Potentially will impact be <br /> Significant Suggested mitigated to Person/Agency <br /> Impacts Mitigation an acceptable responsible for <br /> Measuref level? for implementation <br /> 1 Sewage bLaD_Q l <br /> _i -.-:— N <br /> �7he feasibility of on-site sewage A minimum of three percolation Yes <br /> disposal for this project will primarily tests te" erformed at each Applicant/Local <br /> be dependent upon adequate soil ercola- fieldld p Health District <br /> P leachfield-site.. These tests are <br /> tion at each site. Subsurface soil to be made at the depth of the <br /> conditions are relatively uniform through- depth of the proposed leach <br /> out the site, however, percolation rates field system. If test results <br /> are likely to vary somewhat from lot to do not comply with County <br /> lot. If percolation rates are near the standards, an alternative to <br /> maximum allowable, these minor variations septic tank/leachfield systems <br /> may present a constraint to use of will be required., <br /> individual systems. <br /> �2 —F-nigh concentrations of nitrate-nitrogen Increase lot`sixes to 2 `acres yes <br /> "flg=tration"f 6.9 ma/1 Applicant/Local <br /> -' may result from development at the to-`reduce"to -� Health District. <br /> P concentrations from 6.5 to 5.0 <br /> proposed density, Mg/1. 4 <br /> 1 The utilization of on-site retention ponds Individual lot should sizes be yes <br /> to accommodate storm runoff could adversely increased in size to at least 2 ARPlicant <br /> affect adjacent water supply wells and on- two acres. <br /> site sewage disposal systems. The close <br /> proximity of the standing water in these If lot sizes are not increased Yes <br /> retention ponds to water wells increases to 2 acres a public drainage Applicant t <br /> y•ti„ <br />