My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012885
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CANEPA
>
8721
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-92-15
>
SU0012885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 4:51:22 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:53:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012885
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-92-15
STREET_NUMBER
8721
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CANEPA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212-
APN
08640008
ENTERED_DATE
1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8721 N CANEPA RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CANEPA\8721\SU-92-15_SU-87-21\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. f <br /> potential development. ) Thero osed <br /> to this policy. deve <br /> P F lopment does not conform <br /> 2. Rural residential areas should be <br /> established only in agricultural areas where <br /> there are existing concentrations of small <br /> parcels and should not be established within <br /> or on the fringe of designated urban growth <br /> areas. <br /> FDiscussiQn : eewcen - piety"Tei 81 Y <br /> • Hollebil , beve While tb1s policy addresses <br /> U1_ JU <br /> the es tgbent o a Residential e ould be_noted <br /> at the project would extend the Morada area to the southeast <br /> into agricultural lands. It is anticipated that the entire area <br /> surrounded by Canepa Road and Foppiano Lane will eventually be <br /> developed and other smaller parcels within the study area will be <br /> further subdivided . <br /> 3. Future rural residential development <br /> r- will take place only within the designated <br /> areas and outward expansion will be <br /> discouraged". This development should occur in <br /> a manner that will maintain the rural <br /> r~ character of the area , <br /> Discussion : The <br /> proposed project is inconsistent with this <br /> policy in that it would be an outward expansion of the existing <br /> r Morada residential area into prime agricultural land . It should f <br /> , + be noted that with the cumulative development presently <br /> proposed for the Morada area, there is very little infill <br /> development which can occur. Refer to discussion of Cumulative <br /> Fr Impacts in Section V.D. ) Therefore, an extension of this rural <br /> residential neighborhood could act as a catalyst to create new <br /> infill areas. It is likely that the entire study area will <br /> F develop as rural residential in -the future. <br /> The proposed project would be consistent with existing <br /> development in that average parcel size of 65, 200 square feet <br /> F would be similar to those in the Morada area . (This is large <br /> enough to provide for the keeping of a few animals, excluding hogs <br /> or pigs, as well as small vegetable gardens or orchards, although <br /> too small for commercial agricultural purposes. ) <br /> I <br />. r ' <br /> a <br /> 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.