SU0012885 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.L 2. ELKjrommentaL I ac s If the proposed General Plan Amendment for the project area is approved , a subsequent zone reclassification to RR-65 (Rural Residential , 65, 000 square foot minimum) would be necessary to bring the zoning into conformance with the General Plan. The GA- 40 designation is not consistent with the General Plan designation ` for Rural ltuieeandatheImpacts result ngrelated use conflicts d scussed for agricultur in lb.?, Land Use Section, The intent of RR-65 (Rural Residential ) zoning is to provide large lot rural homesites of a size sufficient toie daheal e desire for rural living and satisfy applcabl requirements. This zone is intended to provide s�waielent size disposal lots to accommodate an individual water supply} g and storm drainage systeme,, thereby precluding the use of public systems. r J The County revised its development policies effective June 11 , 1987 . Two sections relative to the proposed project are Section 9-10201 regarding water supply facilities, and Section 9- 10301 regarding drainage facilities. The revised policies require that water and public drainage systems serving the entire development be provided for any development with parcels less than two acres . Prior to adopting these revisions, the County accepted development applications during a "window period" at which time development plans, including this project, could be submitted under the previous development policies. , ��e proposed development plans call for individual wells and detention - basins to retain the drainage until it can percolate into the ground, Use o t e e 5y.5teps or t le o used o 'ect to he eypluated o t e basis o the previousdevelopment o s as per Zoning 0 d ' a ce Section - 00,02 (c ) ( 1 ) . (Refer to Section V .B for �J a discussion of water supply and drainage. ) Rezoning of the project site would extend the Rural Residential zoning into agriculturally zoned lands. It would also give impetus to rezoning adjoining parcels within the study area, as well as lands south of Foppiano Lane. Although the lands zoned EA lie south of Foppiano Lane, the roadway does not `provide a physical or topographic constraint to inhibit future agricultural land conversions. The growth inducing effects of this project are discussed in Section V . C. As discussed in Section IV. A. , many land use conflicts would arise as - a result of development of residential uses in a predominantly eneralagricultural amendme t andthat zonewould facilitated by the reclassification. proposed g p 28