Laserfiche WebLink
6 Suggested Mitigation_ Measures <br /> A-&- Prop osed__Project <br /> The proposed project would not adversely affect traffic flaw <br /> in the study area . Intersection LOS operation would be unchanged . <br /> For this reason, no specific off-site mitigation is recommended <br /> i for the roads or signals. However, there could be vehicle <br /> conflicts at the two project access points onto Foppiano Lane and <br /> ,, Canepa Road . In response, the following measure is recommended : <br /> Place stop signs at the minor street project access <br /> 1 P � P .� <br /> points onto Foppiano Lane and Canepa Road. i <br /> Fo IL,, Cumulative Development in Immediate o 'ect Study Area <br /> i <br /> FBased on the <br /> ' nu _a_tive _ -vehicle trips generated by these <br /> ojects o t ' ato measure, a e recommended , This would not <br /> include streets and intersections outside the scope of this <br /> analysis, such as Morada Lane and Eight Mile Road . <br /> C . Cumulative MitigatioU huildout Measures <br /> Further mitigation in the project study area has been <br /> proposed in other cumulative area-wide studies .? These <br /> mitigation measures are listed below. <br /> 1. SR 99 Ramps/Hammer Lane - Reconstruct the Hammer Lane/SR <br /> 99 interchange . Redesign is required . Final design would require <br /> consideration of right-of-way availability ; the potential <br /> eastbound extension of Hammer Lane; and additional cumulative <br /> studies. With reconstruction of the Hammer Lane/SR 99 <br /> interchange, the need for signalization at West Frontage/Hammer <br /> intersection would change. Current delays experienced by <br /> motorists during the AM and PM peak hours would likely diminish. <br /> Signals would need to be re-evaluated if construction of the <br /> interchange occurs. k <br /> �. Hammer Lane - Widened to six lanes. <br /> 3� Eight Mile Road - Wide to four lanes, <br /> 7. andjng Mechanisms for Roadway Improvements <br /> In order to _ fund needed roadway and intersection <br /> iMproy_ements, benLe-fit assessment districts _ are often formed . <br /> Other mechanismz include traffic fees imposed by a city_4r__r,,.,ounty <br /> aeencv charged - to developers , (based on the _D�Mter of units or <br /> sguare footage) . In eitber ca, e, The deyeloper would be required <br /> F to pay._ is or her share_ of__the roadway_improvements based on their <br /> pgrcentage cortribvting to traffic impacts. <br /> F <br /> F <br /> 41 <br /> F <br />