My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012885
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CANEPA
>
8721
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-92-15
>
SU0012885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 4:51:22 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:53:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012885
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-92-15
STREET_NUMBER
8721
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CANEPA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212-
APN
08640008
ENTERED_DATE
1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8721 N CANEPA RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CANEPA\8721\SU-92-15_SU-87-21\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ca GROWTH INDUCEMENT <br /> Growth inducement from the proposed project would primarily <br /> result from the southeasterly expansion of the Morada area into <br /> agricultural - lands. Approval of the proposed general plan <br /> amendment and subsequent zone reclassification would facilitate <br /> residential development of the site. This could set a precedent <br /> for future conversions of agricultural land in the project area <br /> especially since there will be increased pressure to develop lands <br /> along the fringe as development infill occurs in Morada . <br /> { Given the current agricultural economy and the demand for <br /> housing of the sort proposed with this project, developing <br /> agricultural land with residential use could prove to be more <br /> economically attractive to farmers in the vicinity of the study <br /> area when compared to remaining in agriculture. Several <br /> of the area farmers surveyed indicated that development of the <br /> proposed project would encourage them to eventually develop their <br /> land in the same manner. 1 Further impetus for development could <br /> be created when land use conflicts resulting from new residential <br /> development adjacent to preexisting agricultural operations causes <br /> farmers to modify or even curtail their farming operations. This <br /> would place an economic burden on those farmers in the area <br /> wishing to maintain their agricultural operations and would serve <br /> as further encouragement to develop their land . It is also a <br /> common practice for farmers to sell off portions of their <br /> landholdings during periods of economic hardship. This could also <br /> contribute to the encroachment of urban uses into agricultural <br /> lands and could encourage "leapfrog" development. <br /> While this project would primarily have growth inducing <br /> effects on adjacent lands, in a long-term context the potential <br /> exists for urban development to extend in a southerly direction ` <br /> away from the study area toward the Calaveras River and east <br /> from Highway 99 since there are no physiographic constraints which <br /> would inhibit urban. growth. It should be noted that the <br /> Stockton Urban Center presently extends to cover the existing <br /> mobile home park and perhaps the Cole proposal located on East <br /> Frontage Road at Wilson Way . It is also foreseeable that urban ' <br /> development could extend in an easterly direction away from the <br /> study area into intensively farmed lands. Ultimate buildout of <br /> parcels extending east to Solari Road, south to the Calaveras <br /> River and west to Highway 99 would result in the loss of over 754 <br /> acres of agricultural land . This would represent a .11% reduction <br /> in the countywide acreage devoted to agricultural use and would <br /> represent a significant loss of prime agricultural soils at the <br /> local , regional , state and national level. <br /> 1 Survey of adjacent property owners conducted by Mills <br /> Associates, November, 1987 . Responses are on file with the <br /> ` San Joaquin County Department of Planning and Building <br /> Inspection. <br /> 57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.